From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755413Ab1BPWtb (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Feb 2011 17:49:31 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:61371 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751506Ab1BPWt3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Feb 2011 17:49:29 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=Ryd4UKjdJvirahUwHj6TijmLHv1E2B6gIZFwOPQHZn/IO49okG+egukaH7wNIf9fZi V8ZIZnZ7lAo3VrbCvaHJpqjMqw+JN2i712E7YYJ90aPr5IquU+waP7Z3ZqHZWLKkiAv5 NZdP9+0bqdgIHyyU1XpMR3uMlT0bJJpG14Qdw= Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 23:49:22 +0100 From: Tejun Heo To: Yinghai Lu Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , David Rientjes , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, numa: cleanup x86_acpi_numa_init() Message-ID: <20110216224922.GD29600@atj.dyndns.org> References: <4D5C3A0F.3080107@kernel.org> <4D5C5046.1030903@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D5C5046.1030903@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 02:31:34PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: > make it more readable. put valid checking together. > > Also restore old acpi_numa_init(). we don't need to touch it > because already have x86 own wrapper. > > Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu What's the point of this patch? If someone else likes it, I don't object but I have no idea why this is any better than before. -- tejun