From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755481Ab1BPWvY (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Feb 2011 17:51:24 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:36814 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753826Ab1BPWvS (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Feb 2011 17:51:18 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=LHVsVj/n+tjTCNRDZkv8tyiuuh9RIM4NhHbSx+1kEWjSmkzQ4E+DWAHkZEAalGSF/4 N5eCtvp4UDPRWCBKBQaTg7FytWHcXsf4H66m2us7QaFC6nPa7Uen9JwARlCYIif1dHOA 0+/dooiNoJEJZ8+HUSkZAv27LGw4PQ0Ohj5/I= Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 23:51:11 +0100 From: Tejun Heo To: Yinghai Lu Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , David Rientjes , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, numa: seperate alloc_numa_distance from numa_reset_distance. Message-ID: <20110216225111.GE29600@atj.dyndns.org> References: <4D5C3A0F.3080107@kernel.org> <4D5C3A40.1060106@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D5C3A40.1060106@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:57:36PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: > > alloc code is much bigger the setting self. > > Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu Again, the same thing. It just depends. Maybe it's slightly more readable this way. Still falls in the realm of bikeshedding. -- tejun