mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86-64, NUMA: Do not scan two times for setup_node_bootmem()
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 11:20:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110221102040.GI31267@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1102191942420.32280@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

>From 2d389b34c02cbc36c561a309735f69568aa9c3ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 10:58:13 +0100

By the time setup_node_bootmem() is called, all the memblocks are
already registered.  As node_data is allocated from these memblocks,
calling it more than once doesn't make any difference.  Drop the loop.

tj: Rephrased description.

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
Applied to x86-numa.  I dropped the comment David pointed out and
redid the description.  If you are unhappy with me redoing the
descriptions, please scream.

Thanks.

 arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c |   32 ++++++++++++--------------------
 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
index f6d85e3..6e4ee96 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
@@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ static bool __init numa_meminfo_cover_memory(const struct numa_meminfo *mi)
 
 static int __init numa_register_memblks(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
 {
-	int i, j, nid;
+	int i, nid;
 
 	/* Account for nodes with cpus and no memory */
 	node_possible_map = numa_nodes_parsed;
@@ -506,28 +506,20 @@ static int __init numa_register_memblks(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
 
 	init_memory_mapping_high();
 
-	/*
-	 * Finally register nodes.  Do it twice in case setup_node_bootmem
-	 * missed one due to missing bootmem.
-	 */
-	for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
-		for_each_node_mask(nid, node_possible_map) {
-			u64 start = (u64)max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
-			u64 end = 0;
+	/* Finally register nodes. */
+	for_each_node_mask(nid, node_possible_map) {
+		u64 start = (u64)max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
+		u64 end = 0;
 
-			if (node_online(nid))
+		for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_blks; i++) {
+			if (nid != mi->blk[i].nid)
 				continue;
-
-			for (j = 0; j < mi->nr_blks; j++) {
-				if (nid != mi->blk[j].nid)
-					continue;
-				start = min(mi->blk[j].start, start);
-				end = max(mi->blk[j].end, end);
-			}
-
-			if (start < end)
-				setup_node_bootmem(nid, start, end);
+			start = min(mi->blk[i].start, start);
+			end = max(mi->blk[i].end, end);
 		}
+
+		if (start < end)
+			setup_node_bootmem(nid, start, end);
 	}
 
 	return 0;
-- 
1.7.1


  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-21 10:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <4D5EC05A.60103@kernel.org>
2011-02-18 18:59 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86, numa: " Yinghai Lu
2011-02-20  4:03   ` David Rientjes
2011-02-21 10:20     ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-02-18 18:59 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86, numa: Do not adjust start/end for early_node_mem() Yinghai Lu
2011-02-20  4:03   ` David Rientjes
2011-02-20  4:17     ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-21  9:43       ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-21 10:44         ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-21 20:28           ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-22 10:36             ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-22 10:39               ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-21 17:21         ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-22  0:27           ` David Rientjes
2011-02-18 18:59 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86, numa: cleanup x86_acpi_numa_init() Yinghai Lu
2011-02-20  4:03   ` David Rientjes
2011-02-21  9:46     ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-18 18:59 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86, numa: seperate alloc_numa_distance from numa_reset_distance Yinghai Lu
2011-02-20  4:03   ` David Rientjes
2011-02-21 10:48   ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-21 17:36     ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-22 10:23       ` [PATCH] x86-64, NUMA: Seperate out numa_alloc_distance() from numa_set_distance() Tejun Heo
2011-02-22 10:30         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-22 10:32           ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110221102040.GI31267@htj.dyndns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®