From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>
Cc: Daniel Drake <dsd@laptop.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of/pdt: allow DT device matching by fixing 'name' brokenness (v3)
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 20:25:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110224032539.GA22111@angua.secretlab.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110223185152.7e3c29a9@queued.net>
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 06:51:52PM -0800, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 19:47:08 -0700
> Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:
> > This addresses one of my comments on v2; but it doesn't address the
> > comment that the broken implementation of of_pdt_node_name for
> > non-sparc still remains, or am I missing something?
> >
> > g.
> >
>
>
> I responded to that -
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/sparclinux/msg08058.html
Weird; that reply didn't show up in my inbox (but my mailer did
receive it, so it is definitely a problem on my end). I'll reply
now...
g.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-24 3:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-23 23:03 [PATCH] of/pdt: allow DT device matching by fixing 'name' brokenness (v2) Andres Salomon
2011-02-23 23:28 ` Grant Likely
2011-02-24 0:16 ` Andres Salomon
2011-02-24 4:06 ` Grant Likely
2011-02-24 4:36 ` Andres Salomon
2011-02-24 5:38 ` Grant Likely
2011-02-24 6:38 ` [PATCH] of/pdt: allow DT device matching by fixing 'name' brokenness (v4) Andres Salomon
2011-02-24 0:34 ` [PATCH] of/pdt: allow DT device matching by fixing 'name' brokenness (v3) Andres Salomon
2011-02-24 2:47 ` Grant Likely
2011-02-24 2:51 ` Andres Salomon
2011-02-24 3:25 ` Grant Likely [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110224032539.GA22111@angua.secretlab.ca \
--to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=dilinger@queued.net \
--cc=dsd@laptop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®