mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL tip:x86/mm]
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 20:23:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110224192305.GB15498@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D66AC9C.6080500@kernel.org>


* Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:

> On 02/24/2011 06:51 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Ingo, please pull from the following git branch to receive four
> > commits from Yinghai.  HEAD is d1b19426b0 (x86: Rename e820_table_* to
> > pgt_buf_*).
> > 
> > The first three separate nobootmem code into mm/nobootmem.c and the
> > last one renames e820_table_* variables to pgt_buf_*.  All four
> > patches are cleanups and shouldn't cause any behavior difference.
> > 
> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/misc.git x86-mm
> > 
> > As usual, if HEAD doesn't appear, please pull from master.
> > 
> >   ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/misc.git x86-mm
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > Yinghai Lu (4):
> >       bootmem: Separate out CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM code into nobootmem.c
> >       bootmem: Move contig_page_data definition to bootmem.c/nobootmem.c
> >       bootmem: Move __alloc_memory_core_early() to nobootmem.c
> >       x86: Rename e820_table_* to pgt_buf_*
> > 
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/init.h |    6 +-
> >  arch/x86/mm/init.c          |   20 +-
> >  arch/x86/mm/init_32.c       |    8 +-
> >  arch/x86/mm/init_64.c       |    4 +-
> >  arch/x86/xen/mmu.c          |    2 +-
> >  include/linux/mm.h          |    2 -
> >  mm/Makefile                 |    8 +-
> >  mm/bootmem.c                |  180 +-----------------
> >  mm/nobootmem.c              |  435 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  mm/page_alloc.c             |   37 ----
> >  10 files changed, 472 insertions(+), 230 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 mm/nobootmem.c
> > 
> 
> better to put first three into seperate branch. and it is with core code.
> something like tip/mm
> 
> So will not pollute tip/x86/mm. and they can be pushed separately.

Well, realistically they will be tested together and will go to Linus under the 
x86/mm label anyway, so there's little reason to keep them separate at this point.

So i've pulled them. Thanks guys!

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-24 19:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-24 14:51 Tejun Heo
2011-02-24 14:52 ` [GIT PULL tip:x86/mm] bootmem,x86: cleanup changes Tejun Heo
2011-02-24 19:08 ` [GIT PULL tip:x86/mm] Yinghai Lu
2011-02-24 19:23   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-02-24 19:28     ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-24 19:32       ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-24 19:46         ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-24 22:46           ` [patch] x86, mm: Fix size of numa_distance array David Rientjes
2011-02-24 23:30             ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-24 23:31             ` David Rientjes
2011-02-25  9:05               ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-25  9:03             ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-25 10:58               ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-25 11:05                 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-25  9:11             ` [PATCH x86-mm] x86-64, NUMA: " Tejun Heo
2011-03-01 17:18       ` [GIT PULL tip:x86/mm] David Rientjes
2011-03-01 18:25         ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-01 22:19         ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-02  9:17           ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 10:04         ` [PATCH x86/mm] x86-64, NUMA: Fix distance table handling Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 10:07           ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-02 10:15             ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 10:36               ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-02 10:25           ` [PATCH x86/mm UPDATED] " Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 10:39             ` [PATCH x86/mm] x86-64, NUMA: Better explain numa_distance handling Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 10:42               ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 14:31                 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-02 14:30             ` [PATCH x86/mm UPDATED] x86-64, NUMA: Fix distance table handling David Rientjes
2011-03-02 15:42               ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 21:12                 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-02 21:36                   ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-03 20:07                     ` David Rientjes
2011-03-04 14:32                       ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-03 20:04                   ` David Rientjes
2011-03-03 20:00                 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-04 15:31               ` [PATCH x86/mm] x86-64, NUMA: Don't assume phys node 0 is always online in numa_emulation() handling Tejun Heo
2011-03-04 21:33                 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-05  7:50                   ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-05 15:50               ` [tip:x86/mm] x86-64, NUMA: Don't assume phys node 0 is always online in numa_emulation() tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 16:16             ` [PATCH x86/mm UPDATED] x86-64, NUMA: Fix distance table handling Yinghai Lu
2011-03-02 16:37               ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 16:46                 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-02 16:55                   ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 18:52                     ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-02 19:02                       ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 19:06                         ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-02 19:13                           ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 20:32                             ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-02 20:57                               ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 21:14                                 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-03  6:17                                   ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-10 18:46                                     ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-11  8:29                                       ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-11  8:33                                         ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-11 15:48                                           ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-11 15:54                                             ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-11 18:02                                               ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-11 18:19                                                 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-11 18:25                                                   ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-11 18:29                                                     ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-11 18:45                                                       ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-11  9:31                                         ` [PATCH x86/mm] x86-64, NUMA: Don't call numa_set_distanc() for all possible node combinations during emulation Tejun Heo
2011-03-11 15:42                                           ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-11 16:03                                             ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-11 19:05                                           ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-02 10:43           ` [PATCH x86/mm] x86-64, NUMA: Fix distance table handling Ingo Molnar
2011-03-02 10:53             ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 10:59               ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110224192305.GB15498@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®