From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751643Ab1BZIYr (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Feb 2011 03:24:47 -0500 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:33823 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751534Ab1BZIYq (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Feb 2011 03:24:46 -0500 Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 00:25:23 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20110226.002523.39185761.davem@davemloft.net> To: mhocko@suse.cz Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, ebiederm@xmission.com Subject: Re: Another list corruption in networking stack with 2.6.38-rc6-00020-gd8204a3? From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20110226082149.GA9623@tiehlicka.suse.cz> References: <20110226082149.GA9623@tiehlicka.suse.cz> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 23.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Michal Hocko Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 09:21:49 +0100 > I am currently on 2.6.38-rc6-00020-gd8204a3 which already contains some > list_del fixes but I remember that there were still some of them > pending. I can really see at least 5f04d5068 which I do not have. Is it > possible that it fixes the above corruption? That commit absolutely will fix your bug.