From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>, Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Cc: heukelum@fastmail.fm, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/asm] x86-64: Add CFI annotations to lib/rwsem_64.S
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 09:56:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110301085630.GA16050@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D6CBBD502000078000343DF@vpn.id2.novell.com>
* Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com> wrote:
> >>> On 28.02.11 at 19:26, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
> > * tip-bot for Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Commit-ID: 39f2205e1abd1b6fffdaf45e1f1c3049a5f8999c
> >> Gitweb:
> > http://git.kernel.org/tip/39f2205e1abd1b6fffdaf45e1f1c3049a5f8999c
> >> Author: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
> >> AuthorDate: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 15:31:59 +0000
> >> Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> >> CommitDate: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:06:21 +0100
> >>
> >> x86-64: Add CFI annotations to lib/rwsem_64.S
> >>
> >> These weren't part of the initial commit of this code.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
> >> Cc: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm>
> >> LKML-Reference: <4D6BCDFF02000078000341B0@vpn.id2.novell.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> >> ---
> >> arch/x86/lib/rwsem_64.S | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> >> 1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >
> > this change breaks the UML build:
> >
> > tip/arch/um/sys-x86_64/../../x86/lib/rwsem_64.S:46: Error: no such
> > instruction: `pushq_cfi %rdi'
>
> Any reason why arch/um/Kconfig.x86 has X86_32 but not
> X86_64? That's resulting in asm/dwarf2.h producing the 32-bit
> (pushl_cfi & Co) macros instead of the 64-bit ones. And I
> wonder what other inconsistencies this may cause...
No idea - UML seems stale. I've Cc:-ed Jeff Dike just in case.
> If this is on purpose (i.e. simply adding X86_64 as a new config
> option there isn't the right solution), what would be the preferred
> way of fixing this in asm/dwarf2.h:
> - #ifndef CONFIG_X86_32,
> - #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT,
> - yet something else?
You could try it out - UML isnt that hard to build: "make ARCH=um" and then run the
resulting binary. It will produce bootup messages then fails when mounting root.
That's enough of a build & functionality test.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-01 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-28 15:31 [PATCH] x86-64: add " Jan Beulich
2011-02-28 17:28 ` [tip:x86/asm] x86-64: Add " tip-bot for Jan Beulich
2011-02-28 18:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-01 8:26 ` Jan Beulich
2011-03-01 8:56 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-03-01 9:38 ` Jan Beulich
2011-03-01 10:37 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110301085630.GA16050@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
--cc=heukelum@fastmail.fm \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®