From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755376Ab1CCKiU (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2011 05:38:20 -0500 Received: from mailrelay008.isp.belgacom.be ([195.238.6.174]:53895 "EHLO mailrelay008.isp.belgacom.be" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751783Ab1CCKiT (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2011 05:38:19 -0500 X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEABv+bk1R8KK1/2dsb2JhbACmdHW+Zg2FVAQ Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 11:38:14 +0100 From: Wim Van Sebroeck To: Alexander Stein Cc: LKML , Linux Watchdog Mailing List , Alan Cox Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 5/10] Generic Watchdog Timer Driver Message-ID: <20110303103814.GA3790@infomag.iguana.be> References: <20110223204330.GA7417@infomag.iguana.be> <201102240921.02967.alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201102240921.02967.alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Alexander, > On Wednesday 23 February 2011, 21:43:30 Wim Van Sebroeck wrote: > > commit 1959ea403c69af855f5cd13e5c9b33123d2137b2 > > Author: Wim Van Sebroeck > > Date: Fri Jun 18 09:45:49 2010 +0000 > > > > watchdog: WatchDog Timer Driver Core - Part 5 > > > > This part add's the WDIOC_SETTIMEOUT and WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT ioctl > > functionality to the WatchDog Timer Driver Core framework. > > > > Signed-off-by: Alan Cox > > Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck > > > > [snip] > > Any specific reason you can only specify seconds as timeout? There is no way > to set a timeout of e.g. 500ms or 1500ms. > You can change this by using using a struct timeval for setting a timeout. > What do you think? 1) The current ioctl call is like this in all drivers. So changing it would break things. 2) Is there a real need for having 500ms or 1500ms? why would 1 or 2 seconds not be OK? (which are allready small timeouts for userspace anyway...) Kind regards, Wim.