From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: stable@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, greg@kroah.com, anton@samba.org,
benh@kernel.crashing.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/7] powerpc/kexec: Speedup kexec hash PTE tear down
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 17:23:09 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110307115309.GG8194@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
powerpc/kexec: Speedup kexec hash PTE tear down
Commit: d504bed676caad29a3dba3d3727298c560628f5c upstream
Currently for kexec the PTE tear down on 1TB segment systems normally
requires 3 hcalls for each PTE removal. On a machine with 32GB of
memory it can take around a minute to remove all the PTEs.
This optimises the path so that we only remove PTEs that are valid.
It also uses the read 4 PTEs at once HCALL. For the common case where
a PTEs is invalid in a 1TB segment, this turns the 3 HCALLs per PTE
down to 1 HCALL per 4 PTEs.
This gives an > 10x speedup in kexec times on PHYP, taking a 32GB
machine from around 1 minute down to a few seconds.
Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Kamalesh babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
Index: b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c
===================================================================
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c 2011-03-07 00:50:53.695992154 -0800
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c 2011-03-07 02:09:06.133815481 -0800
@@ -366,21 +366,28 @@
{
unsigned long size_bytes = 1UL << ppc64_pft_size;
unsigned long hpte_count = size_bytes >> 4;
- unsigned long dummy1, dummy2, dword0;
+ struct {
+ unsigned long pteh;
+ unsigned long ptel;
+ } ptes[4];
long lpar_rc;
- int i;
+ int i, j;
- /* TODO: Use bulk call */
- for (i = 0; i < hpte_count; i++) {
- /* dont remove HPTEs with VRMA mappings */
- lpar_rc = plpar_pte_remove_raw(H_ANDCOND, i, HPTE_V_1TB_SEG,
- &dummy1, &dummy2);
- if (lpar_rc == H_NOT_FOUND) {
- lpar_rc = plpar_pte_read_raw(0, i, &dword0, &dummy1);
- if (!lpar_rc && ((dword0 & HPTE_V_VRMA_MASK)
- != HPTE_V_VRMA_MASK))
- /* Can be hpte for 1TB Seg. So remove it */
- plpar_pte_remove_raw(0, i, 0, &dummy1, &dummy2);
+ /* Read in batches of 4,
+ * invalidate only valid entries not in the VRMA
+ * hpte_count will be a multiple of 4
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < hpte_count; i += 4) {
+ lpar_rc = plpar_pte_read_4_raw(0, i, (void *)ptes);
+ if (lpar_rc != H_SUCCESS)
+ continue;
+ for (j = 0; j < 4; j++) {
+ if ((ptes[j].pteh & HPTE_V_VRMA_MASK) ==
+ HPTE_V_VRMA_MASK)
+ continue;
+ if (ptes[j].pteh & HPTE_V_VALID)
+ plpar_pte_remove_raw(0, i + j, 0,
+ &(ptes[j].pteh), &(ptes[j].ptel));
}
}
}
reply other threads:[~2011-03-07 11:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110307115309.GG8194@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome