From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754468Ab1CGNUc (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Mar 2011 08:20:32 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:63316 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750754Ab1CGNU3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Mar 2011 08:20:29 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=rcbp7YLAy0o+a86ldvBDkyAJyp9ewCPoNMDJPY7SBPtKgKG6I7P9RJusbMh4wA93gh N8QQCTZSyMq24L+xdMeS2P9jn946JR/cgiup7aaAhA7UJg6L0zEX6d3/24QeAhXi7+2C AX0M/jzjI4Iguh2kODYO4fVSoaQQZPf55HL9E= Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 14:20:23 +0100 From: Tejun Heo To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: roland@redhat.com, jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, vda.linux@googlemail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, indan@nul.nu Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] ptrace,signal: group stop / ptrace updates, take#2 Message-ID: <20110307132023.GI20499@htj.dyndns.org> References: <1299321427-15051-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <20110307130332.GA10777@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110307130332.GA10777@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hey, Oleg. On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 02:03:32PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > The second part, 0007-0010, fixes group stop participation accounting > > and make tracees always stop in TASK_TRACED instead of TASK_STOPPED. > > IOW, it implements "P1. Always TASK_TRACED while ptraced" of the > > proposal. > > Looks like, we already discussed these changes? I mean, at first > glance the only difference (compared to the previous series) is that > 10/10 simplifies the usage of task_clear_group_stop_trapping(). Yeah, nothing really changed other than incorporating what you suggested on the last posting. > In this case please free to add my reviewed-by or acked-by. Alright, will add Acked-by's. > As for "who controls" I do not care too. But I think I should help you > as much as I can. I'll contact you in a few days to discuss this, but > let me repeat once again: whatever you prefer is fine for me. Great, I would need a lot of your help; otherwise, I would be breaking things left and right. :-) Thank you. -- tejun