From: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
To: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch V2] bonding: fix netpoll in active-backup mode
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 09:35:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110311143557.GY11864@gospo.rdu.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D7773E3.5050708@redhat.com>
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 08:34:43PM +0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> 于 2011年03月09日 05:24, Andy Gospodarek 写道:
>> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 05:58:56PM +0800, Amerigo Wang wrote:
>>> V2: avoid calling slave_diable_netpoll() with write_lock_bh() held.
>>>
>>> netconsole doesn't work in active-backup mode, because we don't do anything
>>> for nic failover in active-backup mode. We should disable netpoll on the
>>> failing slave when it is detected down and enable netpoll when it becomes
>>> the active slave.
>>>
>>> Tested by ifdown the current active slave and ifup it again for several times,
>>> netconsole works well.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: WANG Cong<amwang@redhat.com>
>>> Cc: Neil Horman<nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
>>>
>>
>> It seems like you are going to a lot of trouble to fix a bug where
>> netpoll will not be setup on any interface that is down when enslaved.
>> That seems to be the only path that would not have slave->np setup
>> properly at enslavement.
>>
>> Did you ever try just this?
>
> That was my first thought, but I was over-worried about the failing slave.
> This way should work too. Mind to send it as a normal patch? :)
>
I'm happy to submit the patch if it works in your environment.
I do not think anyone likes un-tested patches.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-11 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-08 9:58 Amerigo Wang
2011-03-08 13:43 ` Neil Horman
2011-03-09 12:32 ` Cong Wang
2011-03-08 21:24 ` Andy Gospodarek
2011-03-08 21:41 ` Neil Horman
2011-03-09 12:34 ` Cong Wang
2011-03-11 14:35 ` Andy Gospodarek [this message]
2011-03-14 6:04 ` Cong Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110311143557.GY11864@gospo.rdu.redhat.com \
--to=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®