From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Mi Jinlong <mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: roel <roel.kluin@gmail.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd: wrong index used in inner loop
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 18:22:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110314222229.GJ25442@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D79A183.8090306@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 12:13:55PM +0800, Mi Jinlong wrote:
>
>
> J. Bruce Fields:
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 10:32:26PM +0100, roel wrote:
> >> Index i was already used in the outer loop
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >> fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c | 4 ++--
> >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> Not 100% sure this one is needed but it looks suspicious.
> >
> > Looks bad to me, thanks.
> >
> > nfsd4_decode_create_session should probably really be broken up a little
> > bit; if it wasn't so long this would have been more obvious.
> >
> > I'll see if I can slip this into 2.6.38 with a couple other last-minute
> > patches.... Otherwise, it'll be in 2.6.39.
> >
> > --b.
> >
> >> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
> >> index 1275b86..615f0a9 100644
> >> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
> >> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
> >> @@ -1142,7 +1142,7 @@ nfsd4_decode_create_session(struct nfsd4_compoundargs *argp,
> >>
> >> u32 dummy;
> >> char *machine_name;
> >> - int i;
> >> + int i, j;
> >> int nr_secflavs;
> >>
> >> READ_BUF(16);
> >> @@ -1215,7 +1215,7 @@ nfsd4_decode_create_session(struct nfsd4_compoundargs *argp,
> >> READ_BUF(4);
> >> READ32(dummy);
> >> READ_BUF(dummy * 4);
> >> - for (i = 0; i < dummy; ++i)
> >> + for (j = 0; j < dummy; ++j)
> >> READ32(dummy);
>
> We must not use dummy for index here.
> After the first index, READ32(dummy) will change dummy!!!!
Actually, wait, this is kind of silly. I don't see why we couldn't just
skip the loop and do
p += dummy;
Also, your new test is still failing with a BAD_XDR error. Well, maybe
the test should fail--we don't really implement this yet anyway--but it
should at least be getting past the xdr decoding. So something else is
still wrong.
--b.
>
> The following patch fix this problem.
>
> --
> thanks,
> Mi Jinlong
> ============================================================
>
> We must not use dummy for index.
> After the first index, READ32(dummy) will change dummy!!!!
>
> Signed-off-by: Mi Jinlong <mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
> index 615f0a9..8dd70d0 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
> @@ -1140,7 +1140,7 @@ nfsd4_decode_create_session(struct nfsd4_compoundargs *argp,
> {
> DECODE_HEAD;
>
> - u32 dummy;
> + u32 dummy, tmp;
> char *machine_name;
> int i, j;
> int nr_secflavs;
> @@ -1216,7 +1216,7 @@ nfsd4_decode_create_session(struct nfsd4_compoundargs *argp,
> READ32(dummy);
> READ_BUF(dummy * 4);
> for (j = 0; j < dummy; ++j)
> - READ32(dummy);
> + READ32(tmp);
> break;
> case RPC_AUTH_GSS:
> dprintk("RPC_AUTH_GSS callback secflavor "
> --
> 1.7.4.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-14 22:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-08 21:32 roel
2011-03-08 23:40 ` JA Magallón
2011-03-09 0:49 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-03-11 4:13 ` Mi Jinlong
2011-03-14 22:22 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2011-03-14 23:52 ` Trond Myklebust
2011-03-16 22:55 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-03-15 2:31 ` Mi Jinlong
2011-03-17 17:52 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-03-09 23:42 ` Andrew Morton
2011-03-10 18:08 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-03-11 3:52 ` Mi Jinlong
2011-03-14 19:35 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110314222229.GJ25442@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=roel.kluin@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome