From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: azurIt <azurit@pobox.sk>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Regression from 2.6.36
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 20:53:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110317005304.GA1992@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110317001519.GB18911@kroah.com>
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 05:15:19PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > Do you need any other information from me ? I'm able to try other versions or
> > patches but, please, take into account that I have to do this on _production_
> > server (I failed to reproduce it in testing environment). Also, I'm able to try
> > only one kernel per day.
>
> Ick, one kernel per day might make this a bit difficult, but if there
> was any way you could use 'git bisect' to try to narrow this down to the
> patch that caused this problem, it would be great.
>
> You can mark 2.6.35 as working and 2.6.36 as bad and git will go from
> there and try to offer you different chances to find the problem.
Comparing the output of a perf profile between the good/bad kernels might
narrow it down faster than a bisect if something obvious sticks out.
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-17 0:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-15 13:25 azurIt
2011-03-17 0:15 ` Greg KH
2011-03-17 0:53 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2011-03-17 13:30 ` azurIt
2011-04-07 10:01 ` azurIt
2011-04-07 10:19 ` Jiri Slaby
2011-04-07 11:21 ` Américo Wang
2011-04-07 11:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-07 12:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-07 15:27 ` Changli Gao
2011-04-07 15:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12 22:49 ` Andrew Morton
2011-04-13 1:23 ` Changli Gao
2011-04-13 1:31 ` Andrew Morton
2011-04-13 2:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-13 6:54 ` Regarding memory fragmentation using malloc Pintu Agarwal
2011-04-13 11:44 ` Américo Wang
2011-04-13 13:56 ` Pintu Agarwal
2011-04-13 15:25 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2011-04-14 6:44 ` Pintu Agarwal
2011-04-14 10:47 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2011-04-14 12:24 ` Pintu Agarwal
2011-04-14 12:31 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2011-04-13 21:16 ` Regression from 2.6.36 Andrew Morton
2011-04-13 21:24 ` Andrew Morton
2011-04-19 19:29 ` azurIt
2011-04-19 19:55 ` Andrew Morton
2011-04-13 21:44 ` David Rientjes
2011-04-13 21:54 ` Andrew Morton
2011-04-14 2:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-14 5:28 ` Andrew Morton
2011-04-14 6:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-14 9:08 ` azurIt
2011-04-14 10:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-14 10:31 ` azurIt
2011-04-14 10:25 ` Mel Gorman
2011-04-15 9:59 ` azurIt
2011-04-15 10:47 ` Mel Gorman
2011-04-15 10:56 ` azurIt
2011-04-15 11:17 ` Mel Gorman
2011-04-15 11:36 ` azurIt
2011-04-15 13:01 ` Mel Gorman
2011-04-15 13:21 ` azurIt
2011-04-15 14:15 ` Mel Gorman
2011-04-08 12:25 ` azurIt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110317005304.GA1992@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=azurit@pobox.sk \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome