From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>, Alek Du <alek.du@intel.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [patch 2/5] gpio-langwell-fix-crap.patch
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 19:32:49 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110317192449.543350238@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110317192247.722047296@linutronix.de>
[-- Attachment #1: gpio-langwell-fix-crap.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2574 bytes --]
commit 0766d20fd (langwell_gpio: modify EOI handling following change
of kernel irq subsystem) changes
- desc->chip->eoi(irq);
+
+ if (desc->chip->irq_eoi)
+ desc->chip->irq_eoi(irq_get_irq_data(irq));
+ else
+ dev_warn(pg->chip.dev, "missing EOI handler for irq %d\n", irq);
With the following explanation:
"Latest kernel has many changes in IRQ subsystem and its interfaces,
like adding irq_eoi" for struct irq_chip, this patch will make it
support both the new and old interface."
This is completely bogus.
#1) The changelog does not match the patch at all
#2) This driver relies on the assumption that it sits behind an eoi
capable interrupt line. If the implementation of the underlying
chip changes from eoi to irq_eoi then this driver has to follow
that change and not add a total bogosity.
#3) Just mechanically changing eoi to irq_eoi without checking the
background of that change is sloppy at best.
Remove the sillyness and retrieve the interrupt data from irq_desc
directly. No need to go through a sparse irq lookup.
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Cc: Alek Du <alek.du@intel.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
drivers/gpio/langwell_gpio.c | 13 +++++--------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6-tip/drivers/gpio/langwell_gpio.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-tip.orig/drivers/gpio/langwell_gpio.c
+++ linux-2.6-tip/drivers/gpio/langwell_gpio.c
@@ -187,10 +187,11 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, lnw_gpio_ids);
static void lnw_irq_handler(unsigned irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
{
- struct lnw_gpio *lnw = get_irq_data(irq);
- u32 base, gpio;
+ struct irq_data *data = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
+ struct lnw_gpio *lnw = irq_data_get_irq_handler_data(data);
+ struct irq_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip(data);
+ u32 base, gpio, gedr_v;
void __iomem *gedr;
- u32 gedr_v;
/* check GPIO controller to check which pin triggered the interrupt */
for (base = 0; base < lnw->chip.ngpio; base += 32) {
@@ -207,11 +208,7 @@ static void lnw_irq_handler(unsigned irq
writel(gedr_v, gedr);
}
- if (desc->chip->irq_eoi)
- desc->chip->irq_eoi(irq_get_irq_data(irq));
- else
- dev_warn(lnw->chip.dev, "missing EOI handler for irq %d\n", irq);
-
+ chip->irq_eoi(data);
}
static int __devinit lnw_gpio_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-17 19:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-17 19:32 [patch 0/5] gpio: langwell: Cleanup the interrupt mess Thomas Gleixner
2011-03-17 19:32 ` [patch 1/5] gpio; Make Intel chipset gpio drivers depend on x86 Thomas Gleixner
2011-03-17 19:32 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2011-03-17 19:32 ` [patch 3/5] gpio: langwell: Convert irq name space Thomas Gleixner
2011-03-17 19:32 ` [patch 4/5] gpio: langwell: Simplify demux loop Thomas Gleixner
2011-03-17 19:32 ` [patch 5/5] [RFC] gpio: langwell: Clear edge bit before handling Thomas Gleixner
2011-03-18 2:33 ` Du, Alek
2011-03-18 5:06 ` Grant Likely
2011-03-17 19:51 ` [patch 0/5] gpio: langwell: Cleanup the interrupt mess Grant Likely
2011-03-17 21:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110317192449.543350238@linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=alek.du@intel.com \
--cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome