mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trinabh Gupta <trinabh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: arjan@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org, lenb@kernel.org,
	suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
	venki@google.com, ak@linux.intel.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH V1 0/2] cpuidle: global registration of idle states with per-cpu statistics
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:17:45 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110322124724.29408.12885.stgit@tringupt.in.ibm.com> (raw)

This patch series is an early RFC to discuss the feasibility of
avoiding registering of idle states from each cpu.

The core change is to split the cpuidle_device structure into parts
that can be global and parts that has to remain per-cpu.  The per-cpu
pieces are mostly generic statistics that can be independent of
current running driver.

Motivation:
* Simplify the cpuidle subsystem framework and have
  registration/unregistration done by single cpu.

* Minimise the data structure that needs to be maintained for multiple
  cpuidle drivers

* Reference: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/10/37

Advantages:
* Make the cpuidle framework simple for most use cases where C-States
  are symmetric.  In case there are asymmetric C-States detected,
  fallback mechanism should be incorporated to maintain the system
  functional
  https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/10/257
  https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/10/37

* Non x86 archs that does not have asymmetric C-States like POWER, may
  not need the fallback mechanism and hence the framework will be
  simple for most use cases.

Disadvantages:
* Asymmetric C-States are part of x86 ACPI specification.  Incorrect
  handling may functionally affect the system

* Incorporating per-cpu masks for each state to allow/dis-allow global
  states on subset of CPUs may result in an implementation that is
  not better than current solution of having per-cpu states.

This patch series applies on top of the pm_idle cleanup patch
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/3/22/150 (cpuidle: Cleanup pm_idle and 
include driver/cpuidle.c in-kernel)

This patch series is tested on x86 Nehalem system with multiple ACPI
C-States.

This patch series has limitations of not handling multiple driver
registration and switching between drivers on all CPUs mainly due to
incomplete handling of per-cpu enable/disable and driver_data.

Please let us know your comments and suggest possible approaches to
the problem.

---

Trinabh Gupta (2):
      cpuidle: API changes in callers using new cpuidle_state_stats
      cpuidle: Data structure changes for global cpuidle device


 drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c    |   19 +---
 drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c      |   45 ++++++----
 drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c          |  169 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h          |    4 -
 drivers/cpuidle/driver.c           |   24 -----
 drivers/cpuidle/governor.c         |   10 +-
 drivers/cpuidle/governors/Makefile |    2
 drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c   |   16 ++-
 drivers/cpuidle/sysfs.c            |   62 +++++++------
 drivers/idle/default_driver.c      |   39 +++-----
 include/linux/cpuidle.h            |   70 ++++++++++-----
 11 files changed, 245 insertions(+), 215 deletions(-)

--
-Trinabh

             reply	other threads:[~2011-03-22 12:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-22 12:47 Trinabh Gupta [this message]
2011-03-22 12:48 ` [RFC PATCH V1 1/2] cpuidle: Data structure changes for global cpuidle device Trinabh Gupta
2011-03-25  8:12   ` Len Brown
2011-03-25 17:48     ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2011-04-02  0:03       ` Len Brown
2011-03-22 12:48 ` [RFC PATCH V1 2/2] cpuidle: API changes in callers using new cpuidle_state_stats Trinabh Gupta
2011-03-25  7:28 ` [RFC PATCH V1 0/2] cpuidle: global registration of idle states with per-cpu statistics Len Brown
2011-03-25 17:15   ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110322124724.29408.12885.stgit@tringupt.in.ibm.com \
    --to=trinabh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=venki@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®