From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754900Ab1C1QXf (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Mar 2011 12:23:35 -0400 Received: from oproxy1-pub.bluehost.com ([66.147.249.253]:46200 "HELO oproxy1-pub.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754338Ab1C1QXd (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Mar 2011 12:23:33 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=virtuousgeek.org; h=Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Identified-User; b=Pko1oMtMyKeaFQfbkzP2SyuZmBQZMfxtfi3oxAMN0OQas+yNOLggpgs6w+kDFwXRRvVGacv650TvQUieOVhgbEbynxejDRc869JcvFVnlNLZwcpIF9pOVIStWKabh/fM; Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 09:23:29 -0700 From: Jesse Barnes To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Yinghai Lu , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Remove dma32_reserve_bootmem Message-ID: <20110328092329.6e5ac682@jbarnes-desktop> In-Reply-To: <20110328162213.GA20191@elte.hu> References: <4D8AD6E0.10307@kernel.org> <20110324080326.GA30812@elte.hu> <20110328091946.7ab9165f@jbarnes-desktop> <20110328162213.GA20191@elte.hu> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.22.0; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {10642:box514.bluehost.com:virtuous:virtuousgeek.org} {sentby:smtp auth 67.161.37.189 authed with jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org} Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:22:13 +0200 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 09:03:26 +0100 > > Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > > > * Yinghai Lu wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > That is workaround for holding dma32 buf when early bootmem could use up > > > > those range on system that have lots of RAM. > > > > > > > > Now x86 is using memblock, and even nobootmem wrapper do top-down allocation. > > > > > > > > So We could remove those not needed code now. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu > > > > > > > > --- > > > > arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h | 2 - > > > > arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c | 64 --------------------------------------------- > > > > arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 1 > > > > 3 files changed, 67 deletions(-) > > > > > > Cc:-ing Jesse - i suspect this should be handled by the PCI tree. > > > > Please re-send, sounds good in theory but I'd like to see the patch. > > It should be in your lkml folder, the first mail in this thread has the patch. If I kept everything in my lkml folder maybe... :) -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center