From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: scxby <scxby@163.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Darren Hart <darren@dvhart.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: PROBLEM:a bug about pi-futex maybe let the program going to hang
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 13:16:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110328171640.GB8529@home.goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A97FC25C3A4B47D2A3C623C690CA5FC5@xiewentao>
Thanks for the report, I added Cc to people that may be able to help.
-- Steve
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 12:19:03PM +0800, scxby wrote:
> hi, all.
>
> Maybe, there is a bug about pi-futex, it would let the program in user-space going to hang.
>
> We have a board: CPU is powerpc 8572, two core. after ran one month, the state of pi-futex in user-space got bad: mutex->__data.__lock is 0x8000023e, mutex->__data.__count is 0, mutex->__data.__owner is 0.
>
> then, I review file "kernel/funtex.c"(the version is linux 2.6.38), found a case:
>
> if there are 3 thread, named threadA, threadB, threadC??thread A hold mutexM, threadB and threadC is waiting mutexM. They run as fllow steps:
>
> 1. threadB and threadC sleep at line 1984.
> 2. threadB receive a signal, then it will be wake up.
> 3. threadA unlock mutexM, and give mutexM to threadB.
> 4. threadB call fixup_owner, try to give mutex to threadC.
> 5. at line 1580, threadB trigger a addr-fault, then goto handle_fault.
> 6. at line 1617, threadB release spinlock, then handle fault.
> 7. threadC got spinlock, and call fixup_owner, and got mutexM.
> 8. threadC give mutexM to threadB.
> 9. threadB re-got spinlock, it will found "pi_state->owner == oldowner" and retry to fixup.
> 10. threadB give mutexM to threadC, that's a bad thing.
>
> we have wrote a program, this program can prove all above
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-28 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-26 4:19 scxby
2011-03-28 17:16 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2011-03-28 7:25 xby
2011-03-28 8:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-28 22:13 ` Darren Hart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110328171640.GB8529@home.goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=darren@dvhart.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=scxby@163.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®