From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: John Linn <John.Linn@xilinx.com>
Cc: <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Subject: Re: xilinx linux-next tree addition request
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 10:13:53 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110330101353.40d40776.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58f8b399-ac49-484c-9e99-d23bcda08a8b@VA3EHSMHS024.ehs.local>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2223 bytes --]
Hi John,
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 14:35:12 -0600 John Linn <John.Linn@xilinx.com> wrote:
>
> I have a tree I'd like to see show up in linux-next:
>
> git://git.xilinx.com/linux-2.6-xlnx.git arm-next
>
> After v2.6.39-rc1 is released, it will contain Xilinx ARM work intended
> for the 2.6.40 merge window. Everything in there has been posted,
> reviewed, fixed, etc...
>
> If order makes a difference, it would be best if it's after Russell's
> tree as it could have dependencies on stuff in his tree.
This will be added from today (I was waiting for -rc1). I have put you
down as the contact, if you want any additional people/lists, then just
let me know.
Thanks for adding your subsystem tree as a participant of linux-next. As
you may know, this is not a judgment of your code. The purpose of
linux-next is for integration testing and to lower the impact of
conflicts between subsystems in the next merge window.
You will need to ensure that the patches/commits in your tree/series have
been:
* submitted under GPL v2 (or later) and include the Contributor's
Signed-off-by,
* posted to the relevant mailing list,
* reviewed by you (or another maintainer of your subsystem tree),
* successfully unit tested, and
* destined for the current or next Linux merge window.
Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him
to fetch). It is allowed to be rebased if you deem it necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
sfr@canb.auug.org.au
Legal Stuff:
By participating in linux-next, your subsystem tree contributions are
public and will be included in the linux-next trees. You may be sent
e-mail messages indicating errors or other issues when the
patches/commits from your subsystem tree are merged and tested in
linux-next. These messages may also be cross-posted to the linux-next
mailing list, the linux-kernel mailing list, etc. The linux-next tree
project and IBM (my employer) make no warranties regarding the linux-next
project, the testing procedures, the results, the e-mails, etc. If you
don't agree to these ground rules, let me know and I'll remove your tree
from participation in linux-next.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-29 23:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-25 20:35 John Linn
2011-03-29 23:13 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2011-03-29 23:18 ` John Linn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110330101353.40d40776.sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=John.Linn@xilinx.com \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®