From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754039Ab1DDJI1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Apr 2011 05:08:27 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:36351 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751016Ab1DDJI0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Apr 2011 05:08:26 -0400 Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 02:07:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20110404.020748.212408124.davem@davemloft.net> To: ian.campbell@citrix.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add entry for Xen network backend From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <1301905567-7880-1-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com> References: <1301905567-7880-1-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 23.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Ian Campbell Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 09:26:07 +0100 > +XEN NETWORK BACKEND DRIVER > +M: Ian Campbell > +L: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com (moderated for non-subscribers) > +S: Supported > +F: drivers/net/xen-netback/* > + To me there isn't much reason to have patch and other discussions about a network driver on a moderated XEN list (which the majority of core network developers are not subscribed to). If anything, list both. But not listing netdev is pretty pointless.