From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758097Ab1DLQM2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Apr 2011 12:12:28 -0400 Received: from oproxy3-pub.bluehost.com ([69.89.21.8]:57041 "HELO oproxy3-pub.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1758082Ab1DLQM1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Apr 2011 12:12:27 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=virtuousgeek.org; h=Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Identified-User; b=XvvGJZv5dpfq1PzjP5jUAMedaqH6L+3f0e4mJYojd48Fm3ZYL31Le6RaBdyKNH2Pl5Im+5ZfhjwL0D6lHtnE0njtHUnlQV4CNZxWK/xzWo5BtA2Z9qUDaG0Uclo6snGH; Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 09:11:45 -0700 From: Jesse Barnes To: Yinghai Lu Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Remove dma32_reserve_bootmem Message-ID: <20110412091145.2bc5e6a9@jbarnes-desktop> In-Reply-To: <4D90CBE5.6090706@kernel.org> References: <4D90CBE5.6090706@kernel.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.22.0; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {10642:box514.bluehost.com:virtuous:virtuousgeek.org} {sentby:smtp auth 67.161.37.189 authed with jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org} Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 10:56:53 -0700 Yinghai Lu wrote: > > That is workaround for holding dma32 buf when early bootmem could use up > those range on system that have lots of RAM. > > Now x86 is using memblock, and even nobootmem wrapper do top-down allocation. > > So We could remove those not needed code now. > > Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu > Looks like a nice cleanup, can you re-send based on my linux-next branch? Thanks, -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center