From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756934Ab1DLR6k (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Apr 2011 13:58:40 -0400 Received: from cpoproxy2-pub.bluehost.com ([67.222.39.38]:46195 "HELO cpoproxy2-pub.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753409Ab1DLR6i (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Apr 2011 13:58:38 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=virtuousgeek.org; h=Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Identified-User; b=Ocsi4HRdX4DL9d70QBItbR6I0BecydzKSxw10cCGxe8HRFKKC+r7aSu3ayGfFk4aC8tWameR68t3G6AzUBZ77IykD+nW5sB/yPco8PRZVku6gn2MfCRkiQ1ujK+m/1Vg; Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:58:27 -0700 From: Jesse Barnes To: Yinghai Lu Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] x86: Remove dma32_reserve_bootmem Message-ID: <20110412105827.443bd56e@jbarnes-desktop> In-Reply-To: <4DA491C6.90403@kernel.org> References: <4D90CBE5.6090706@kernel.org> <20110412091145.2bc5e6a9@jbarnes-desktop> <4DA489F0.4000003@kernel.org> <20110412104716.5388849d@jbarnes-desktop> <4DA491C6.90403@kernel.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.22.0; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {10642:box514.bluehost.com:virtuous:virtuousgeek.org} {sentby:smtp auth 67.161.37.189 authed with jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org} Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:54:14 -0700 Yinghai Lu wrote: > On 04/12/2011 10:47 AM, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:20:48 -0700 > > Yinghai Lu wrote: > > > >> > >> That is workaround for holding dma32 buf when early bootmem could use up > >> those range on system that have lots of RAM. > >> > >> Now x86 is using memblock, and even nobootmem wrapper do top-down allocation. > >> > >> So We could remove those not needed code now. > >> > >> -v2: rebase on pci-next > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu > >> > > > > Hm, still didn't apply cleanly, I guess the patch got corrupted. I > > fixed it up by hand and applied to linux-next though, thanks. > > sorry for that. looks like recent thunderbird upgrade convert TAB to space.. Thanks for checking. I wonder why every mailer (and some MTAs!) feel the need to molest message content so thoroughly... -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center