From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.39-rc4 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000c IP: cfq_insert_request+0x1d/0x3f5
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 09:00:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110422070032.GA3575@tiehlicka.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DB07ECA.5050309@fusionio.com>
On Thu 21-04-11 21:00:26, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2011-04-21 20:51, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Thu 21-04-11 07:38:57, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:25 AM, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I am going to bisect, let's see if I can find anything.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks, that would be great!
> >>
> >> I'd expect it to be very timing-dependent, and thus could easily be
> >> triggered (or hidden) by unrelated changes.
> >>
> >> Just happening to have a request added to the elevator at _just_ the
> >> same moment that another CPU is changing it and getting rid of the
> >> data structures for the old one.
> >
> > And it really looks like a timing issue. I have bisected down to
> > e710d7d5a9cab1041b7a3cf9e655b75d92786857. I had to skip[1] some commits
> > due to compile errors [2].
> > At first it looked quite promising because I was able to boot after I
> > reverted that patch but then I have tried to revert it on top of rc4
> > (2f666bcf757cb72549f360ef6da02f03620a48b6) and saw the same problem
> > again.
> >
> > So I do not think that bisecting will help here.
>
> It will be timing dependent. If there's no allocated IO requests when
> the switch happens, it'll work.
>
> But the commit that caused this regression is 5e84ea3a. If you revert
> that, it should work fine. Or just apply the patch I sent (or update to
> Linus' tree, it's in now) and it'll work as well.
Great. I can boot just fine with the current Linus tree
(2.6.39-rc4-00149-g91e8549).
Thanks a lot!
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
SUSE LINUX s.r.o.
Lihovarska 1060/12
190 00 Praha 9
Czech Republic
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-22 7:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-20 12:58 Michal Hocko
2011-04-20 13:03 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-20 13:13 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-20 13:29 ` Michal Hocko
2011-04-20 13:31 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-20 17:33 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-21 7:16 ` Michal Hocko
2011-04-21 7:25 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-21 14:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-21 15:29 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-21 18:52 ` Michal Hocko
2011-04-21 18:51 ` Michal Hocko
2011-04-21 19:00 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-22 7:00 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2011-04-22 11:35 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-22 20:30 ` Hugh Dickins
2011-04-21 15:04 ` Jeff Moyer
2011-04-21 15:27 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-21 15:51 ` Jeff Moyer
2011-04-21 15:30 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110422070032.GA3575@tiehlicka.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®