Re: [PATCH 2/3] Documentation: Correct a couple missing words in inotify.txt

[Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>]

On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 19:35:03 -0500 Aaron Faanes wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Aaron Faanes <dafrito@gmail.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/filesystems/inotify.txt |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/inotify.txt b/Documentation/filesystems/inotify.txt
> index f00c435..8d8cba1 100644
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/inotify.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/inotify.txt
> @@ -248,9 +248,9 @@ A: An fd-per-watch quickly consumes more file descriptors than are allowed,
>  
>     When you talk about designing a file change notification system that
>     scales to 1000s of directories, juggling 1000s of fd's just does not seem
> -   the right interface.  It is too heavy.
> +   to be the right interface.  It is too heavy.

either way is OK.

>  
> -   Additionally, it _is_ possible to more than one instance and
> +   Additionally, it _is_ possible to have more than one instance and

OK, there is the missing word.

>     juggle more than one queue and thus more than one associated fd.  There
>     need not be a one-fd-per-process mapping; it is one-fd-per-queue and a
>     process can easily want more than one queue.
> -- 


---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***