Em Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 12:28:33PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > Em Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 09:40:38PM +0800, Lin Ming escreveu: > > On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 01:05 +0800, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 22:57 +0800, Lin Ming wrote: > > > > Currently, kernel only allows an event to redirect its output to other > > > > events of the same task. > > > > This causes PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_OUTPUT ioctl fails when an event is > > > > trying to redirect its output to other events in the same thread group. > > > Which is exactly what it should do, you should never be allowed to > > > redirect your events to that of another task, since that other task > > > might be running on another CPU. > > > The buffer code strictly assumes no concurrency, therefore its either > > > one task or one CPU. > > Well, this is not the right fix, then the perf tool code need to be > > fixed. > Yes, I'm working on it. Lin, David, Tim, can you please try the two patches attached? Tested with: [root@felicio ~]# tuna -t 26131 -CP | nl 1 thread ctxt_switches 2 pid SCHED_ rtpri affinity voluntary nonvoluntary cmd 3 26131 OTHER 0 0,1 10814276 2397830 chromium-browse 4 642 OTHER 0 0,1 14688 0 chromium-browse 5 26148 OTHER 0 0,1 713602 115479 chromium-browse 6 26149 OTHER 0 0,1 801958 2262 chromium-browse 7 26150 OTHER 0 0,1 1271128 248 chromium-browse 8 26151 OTHER 0 0,1 3 0 chromium-browse 9 27049 OTHER 0 0,1 36796 9 chromium-browse 10 618 OTHER 0 0,1 14711 0 chromium-browse 11 661 OTHER 0 0,1 14593 0 chromium-browse 12 29048 OTHER 0 0,1 28125 0 chromium-browse 13 26143 OTHER 0 0,1 2202789 781 chromium-browse [root@felicio ~]# So 11 threads under pid 26131, then: [root@felicio ~]# perf record -F 50000 --pid 26131 [root@felicio ~]# grep perf_event /proc/`pidof perf`/maps | nl 1 7fa4a2538000-7fa4a25b9000 rwxs 00000000 00:09 4064 anon_inode:[perf_event] 2 7fa4a25b9000-7fa4a263a000 rwxs 00000000 00:09 4064 anon_inode:[perf_event] 3 7fa4a263a000-7fa4a26bb000 rwxs 00000000 00:09 4064 anon_inode:[perf_event] 4 7fa4a26bb000-7fa4a273c000 rwxs 00000000 00:09 4064 anon_inode:[perf_event] 5 7fa4a273c000-7fa4a27bd000 rwxs 00000000 00:09 4064 anon_inode:[perf_event] 6 7fa4a27bd000-7fa4a283e000 rwxs 00000000 00:09 4064 anon_inode:[perf_event] 7 7fa4a283e000-7fa4a28bf000 rwxs 00000000 00:09 4064 anon_inode:[perf_event] 8 7fa4a28bf000-7fa4a2940000 rwxs 00000000 00:09 4064 anon_inode:[perf_event] 9 7fa4a2940000-7fa4a29c1000 rwxs 00000000 00:09 4064 anon_inode:[perf_event] 10 7fa4a29c1000-7fa4a2a42000 rwxs 00000000 00:09 4064 anon_inode:[perf_event] 11 7fa4a2a42000-7fa4a2ac3000 rwxs 00000000 00:09 4064 anon_inode:[perf_event] [root@felicio ~]# 11 mmaps, one per thread since we didn't specify any CPU list, so we need one mmap per thread and: [root@felicio ~]# perf record -F 50000 --pid 26131 ^M ^C[ perf record: Woken up 79 times to write data ] [ perf record: Captured and wrote 20.614 MB perf.data (~900639 samples) ] [root@felicio ~]# perf report -D | grep PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE | cut -d/ -f2 | cut -d: -f1 | sort -n | uniq -c | sort -nr | nl 1 371310 26131 2 96516 26148 3 95694 26149 4 95203 26150 5 7291 26143 6 87 27049 7 76 661 8 60 29048 9 47 618 10 43 642 [root@felicio ~]# Ok, one of the threads, 26151 was quiescent, so no samples there, but all the others are there. Then, if I specify one CPU: [root@felicio ~]# perf record -F 50000 --pid 26131 --cpu 1 ^C[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ] [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.680 MB perf.data (~29730 samples) ] [root@felicio ~]# perf report -D | grep PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE | cut -d/ -f2 | cut -d: -f1 | sort -n | uniq -c | sort -nr | nl 1 8444 26131 2 2584 26149 3 2518 26148 4 2324 26150 5 123 26143 6 9 661 7 9 29048 [root@felicio ~]# This machine has two cores, so fewer threads appeared on the radar, and: [root@felicio ~]# grep perf_event /proc/`pidof perf`/maps | nl 1 7f484b922000-7f484b9a3000 rwxs 00000000 00:09 4064 anon_inode:[perf_event] [root@felicio ~]# Just one mmap, as now we can use just one per-cpu buffer instead of the per-thread needed in the previous case. For global profiling: [root@felicio ~]# perf record -F 50000 -a ^C[ perf record: Woken up 26 times to write data ] [ perf record: Captured and wrote 7.128 MB perf.data (~311412 samples) ] [root@felicio ~]# grep perf_event /proc/`pidof perf`/maps | nl 1 7fb49b435000-7fb49b4b6000 rwxs 00000000 00:09 4064 anon_inode:[perf_event] 2 7fb49b4b6000-7fb49b537000 rwxs 00000000 00:09 4064 anon_inode:[perf_event] [root@felicio ~]# It uses per-cpu buffers. For just one thread: [root@felicio ~]# perf record -F 50000 --tid 26148 ^C[ perf record: Woken up 2 times to write data ] [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.330 MB perf.data (~14426 samples) ] [root@felicio ~]# perf report -D | grep PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE | cut -d/ -f2 | cut -d: -f1 | sort -n | uniq -c | sort -nr | nl 1 9969 26148 [root@felicio ~]# [root@felicio ~]# grep perf_event /proc/`pidof perf`/maps | nl 1 7f286a51b000-7f286a59c000 rwxs 00000000 00:09 4064 anon_inode:[perf_event] [root@felicio ~]# Can you guys please test it and provide Tested-by and/or Acked-by? Thanks, - Arnaldo