From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754267Ab1D2PGu (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Apr 2011 11:06:50 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:21943 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751563Ab1D2PGt (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Apr 2011 11:06:49 -0400 Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:06:42 +0200 From: Jiri Olsa To: Steven Rostedt Cc: fweisbec@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] x86_64,tracing: multiplexing function tracer Message-ID: <20110429150642.GA1966@jolsa.brq.redhat.com> References: <1304088194-6214-1-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com> <1304089030.18763.257.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1304089030.18763.257.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:57:10AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 16:43 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > hi, me again ;) > > > > from last RFC email it turned out it'd be good to have support > > for more than 1 currently running function tracers. With > > the possibility to specify separate filter for each of them. > > Jiri, I thought I told you to wait, as I'm basically doing the same > thing. Except that I'm gutting the heck out of ftrace.c. yep, I was just keeping busy.. ;) looking forward to see your change jirka > > I've been working the last several days rewriting this code. > > > > > I thought about one way how to do that and put it to the > > code for considering. It seems to work properly, though > > I was fighting with set_ftrace_filter for a while.. and > > it is still not ideal ;) > > Soon, set_ftrace_filter will only affect the function tracer and not any > other user of function tracing. > > I'm almost done. I was hoping to release something today, but it will > probably have to wait till next week. > > -- Steve > >