Re: [PATCH 00/18] RAS daemon: Easter Eggs Edition

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>]

Em Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 04:31:45PM +0200, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> 
> * Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:08:48AM -0400, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > 
> > > If you want to accelerate that, I suggest you cut your patchset into 
> > > smaller sets and focus on merging them piece by piece. Few people are going 
> > > to review 18 patches at once. They may plan to scatter their review over 
> > > days but that doesn't scale well, and it naturally reduces the number of 
> > > reviewers.
> > > 
> > > You could start with exporting trace things into tools/trace, post the few 
> > > concerned patches and iterate them until everyone is happy. Then switch to 
> > > another subset of the big thing.
> > 
> > Hi Frederic,
> > 
> > I can definitely do that. I just wanted to know before I do it though, 
> > whether the general direction is ok and whether people are fine with the 
> > changes, i.e. Arnaldo, Ingo, Peter, Steven, any reactions? If yes, I can get 
> > to work and split the big pile into more digestible pieces.
> 
> I definitely like the general approach, it's a big step forward from mcelog. 
> Might make sense to progress to the small digestible patches stage to get out 
> the detailed reviews?

+1
 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	Ingo