From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, rientjes@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/25] x86-64, NUMA: simplify nodedata allocation
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 14:02:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110430120217.GD29280@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DBAF40F.8030207@kernel.org>
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:23:27AM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On 04/29/2011 08:28 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > With top-down memblock allocation, the allocation range limits in
> > ealry_node_mem() can be simplified - try node-local first, then any
> > node but in any case don't allocate below DMA limit.
> >
> > Remove early_node_mem() and implement simplified allocation directly
> > in setup_node_bootmem().
>
> keep early_node_mem would be better?
I don't know, maybe, maybe not. I usually find separating out linear
procedural logic into a function, which is used only once, more
distracting / obfuscating than helpful.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-30 12:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-29 15:28 [PATCHSET tip] x86, NUMA: Unify 32 and 64bit NUMA initialization Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 01/25] x86-64, NUMA: Simplify hotadd memory handling Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 02/25] x86-64, NUMA: trivial cleanups for setup_node_bootmem() Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 03/25] x86-64, NUMA: simplify nodedata allocation Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 17:23 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 12:02 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 04/25] x86-32, NUMA: Automatically set apicid -> node in setup_local_APIC() Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 05/25] x86, NUMA: Unify 32/64bit numa_cpu_node() implementation Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 06/25] x86-32, NUMA: Make apic->x86_32_numa_cpu_node() optional Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 07/25] x86-32, NUMA: use sparse_memory_present_with_active_regions() Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 08/25] x86, NUMA: trivial cleanups Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 17:25 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 12:03 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-30 16:24 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 18:00 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-30 23:10 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 23:11 ` [PATCH] x86, numa: Rename setup_node_bootmem to setup_node_data Yinghai Lu
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 09/25] x86, NUMA: rename srat_64.c to srat.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 10/25] x86, NUMA: make srat.c 32bit safe Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 11/25] x86-32, NUMA: Move get_memcfg_numa() into numa_32.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 12/25] x86, NUMA: Move numa_nodes_parsed to numa.[hc] Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 13/25] x86-32, NUMA: implement temporary NUMA init shims Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 14/25] x86-32, NUMA: Replace srat_32.c with srat.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 15/25] x86-32, NUMA: Update numaq to use new NUMA init protocol Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 16/25] x86, NUMA: Move NUMA init logic from numa_64.c to numa.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 17/25] x86, NUMA: Enable build of generic NUMA init code on 32bit Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 18/25] x86, NUMA: Remove long 64bit assumption from numa.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 19/25] x86-32, NUMA: Add @start and @end to init_alloc_remap() Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 20/25] x86, NUMA: Initialize and use remap allocator from setup_node_bootmem() Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 21/25] x86, NUMA: Make 32bit use common NUMA init path Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 22/25] x86, NUMA: Make numa_init_array() static Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 23/25] x86, NUMA: Rename amdtopology_64.c to amdtopology.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 24/25] x86, NUMA: Enable CONFIG_AMD_NUMA on 32bit too Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 25/25] x86, NUMA: Enable emulation " Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 18:15 ` [PATCHSET tip] x86, NUMA: Unify 32 and 64bit NUMA initialization Ingo Molnar
2011-04-29 20:14 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 12:17 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-30 12:33 ` [PATCH] x86, NUMA: Fix empty memblk detection in numa_cleanup_meminfo() Tejun Heo
2011-04-30 12:35 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-01 0:43 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-01 10:20 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-01 19:44 ` [PATCH] x86, numa: Trim numa meminfo with max_pfn in separated loop Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 16:31 ` [PATCHSET tip] x86, NUMA: Unify 32 and 64bit NUMA initialization Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110430120217.GD29280@htj.dyndns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome