mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
	Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: fix constructing the span cpu mask of sched domain
Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 09:12:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110506071233.GC23166@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=qPWxRAa6+dT3ohEP6Z=0v+e4EXA@mail.gmail.com>


* Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com> wrote:

> For a given node, when constructing the cpumask for its sched_domain
> to span, if there is no best node available after searching, further
> efforts could be saved, based on small change in the return value of
> find_next_best_node().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
> ---
> 
> --- a/kernel/sched.c	2011-04-27 11:48:50.000000000 +0800
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c	2011-05-05 20:44:52.000000000 +0800
> @@ -6787,7 +6787,7 @@ init_sched_build_groups(const struct cpu
>   */
>  static int find_next_best_node(int node, nodemask_t *used_nodes)
>  {
> -	int i, n, val, min_val, best_node = 0;
> +	int i, n, val, min_val, best_node = -1;
> 
>  	min_val = INT_MAX;
> 
> @@ -6811,7 +6811,8 @@ static int find_next_best_node(int node,
>  		}
>  	}
> 
> -	node_set(best_node, *used_nodes);
> +	if (best_node != -1)
> +		node_set(best_node, *used_nodes);
>  	return best_node;
>  }
> 
> @@ -6837,7 +6838,8 @@ static void sched_domain_node_span(int n
> 
>  	for (i = 1; i < SD_NODES_PER_DOMAIN; i++) {
>  		int next_node = find_next_best_node(node, &used_nodes);
> -
> +		if (next_node < 0)
> +			break;
>  		cpumask_or(span, span, cpumask_of_node(next_node));
>  	}
>  }

Looks good. I changed the title from:

  sched: fix constructing the span cpu mask of sched domain

to:

  sched: Shorten the constructing of the span cpu mask of sched domain

Because unless i missed some side effect it really does not 'fix' anything, it 
avoids repetitive (and ultimately fruitless) extra work, right?

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-06  7:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-05 12:53 Hillf Danton
2011-05-06  7:12 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-05-06  7:40 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Shorten the construction of " tip-bot for Hillf Danton
2011-05-10  8:32 ` [PATCH] sched: fix constructing " Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-10 12:29   ` Hillf Danton
2011-05-11 13:26   ` Hillf Danton
2011-05-11 13:54     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-11 14:10       ` Hillf Danton
2011-05-11 14:15         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-11 14:23           ` Hillf Danton
2011-05-13 13:06       ` Hillf Danton
2011-05-15  5:50       ` Hillf Danton
2011-05-17  9:23         ` Andreas Herrmann
2011-05-17 14:36           ` Hillf Danton
2011-05-18  2:45             ` Yong Zhang
2011-05-18 15:12               ` Hillf Danton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110506071233.GC23166@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=dhillf@gmail.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome