From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754129Ab1EITV3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2011 15:21:29 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:34343 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754100Ab1EITV2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2011 15:21:28 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Todd Poynor Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 1/5] PM / Runtime: Support for generic I/O power domains (v3) Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 21:22:09 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.39-rc5+; KDE/4.6.0; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Linux PM mailing list , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Greg KH , LKML , Grant Likely , Guennadi Liakhovetski References: <201104290154.12966.rjw@sisk.pl> <201105082322.44268.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201105092122.09690.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday, May 09, 2011, Todd Poynor wrote: > On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > ... > > > power management (i.e. ->stop_device() may disable a device's > > clocks, while ->start_device() may enable them, ->power_on() is > > supposed to remove power from the entire power domain > > and ->power_off() is supposed to restore it). > > > > power_off removes power, power_on restores? Yes, that's the intention. Thanks for spotting that! Rafael