From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933375Ab1ERSNR (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 May 2011 14:13:17 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:33469 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757309Ab1ERSNQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 May 2011 14:13:16 -0400 Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 20:13:05 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Steven Rostedt Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Frederic Weisbecker Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] [GIT PULL] ftrace/recordmcount: cleanups and updates for recordmcount processing Message-ID: <20110518181305.GB8190@elte.hu> References: <20110518160809.724215604@goodmis.org> <1305736137.11267.13.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1305736137.11267.13.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.3.1 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 12:08 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > Ingo, > > > > Please pull the latest tip/perf/core-2 tree, which can be found at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-2.6-trace.git > > tip/perf/core-2 > > > > Note, this is not based off of my tip/perf/core branch, but is based off > of tip separately. I pulled your tip/perf/core (b9df92d2a94e) on May 1, almost 3 weeks ago, into tip:perf/core. > I'm not sure why you don't want to pull my tip/perf/core directly yet. Because i already have? :-) > [...] I'd like to get that infrastructure in and tested before the 40 merge > window so that we can focus on the perf function tracing in the 41 window, > and not try to figure out where bugs are between the two. > > That pull request is here: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130469692420787 Well, that is an RFC patchset, named: [RFC][PATCH 00/13] ftrace: Allow multiple users to pick and choose functions In that mail you specifically said: " I'm posting this patch series as an RFC, but I do not expect it to change much. I still have to put it through more tests even though I ran several on each set already. " ... with no pull vector in it. If you want me to pull something you need to put it into a branch i can see and you need to send a pull request :-) Thanks, Ingo