mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@gmail.com>, Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: New boot time message: detected capacity change
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 07:29:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110519052903.GA2904@mtj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimY+y3vXa0R7Evs6dYLVjJ==KVq1A@mail.gmail.com>

Hello, Linus.

On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 01:50:19PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> As it was, I feel that those commit descriptions were actively
> misleading me into thinking this was a regression.

The commit message is incomplete rather than misleading.  The problem
has been there for a long time but hasn't affected cdrom so not many
people have noticed it.  The changes to media revalidation exposed the
bug for cdrom too, so it became a regression for 2.6.38.  Please refer
to the following thread.

  https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/3/31/436

As the root cause was the same as the 2009 bug, I just referenced that
one.  I should have included the link to the newer thread or explained
how it affected recent conversion from ->media_changed to
->check_events.  My bad.

> Maybe it won't cause any problems, but -rc7 is not the time to make
> these kinds of experiments!

The patch was posted Apr 6th.  It somehow took quite long to reach
your tree.  Sorry about that too.

As for the warning message, I think it wouldn't be harmful but at -rc7
I'm a bit nervous too.  I'll take a deeper look.

Thank you.

--
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-19  5:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-18 20:32 Tony Luck
2011-05-18 20:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-19  5:29   ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-05-19  6:01     ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-19  7:27       ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-19  7:25   ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-19  9:30 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-19 17:39   ` Tony Luck
2011-05-23 11:24     ` [PATCH] block: move bd_set_size() above rescan_partitions() in __blkdev_get() Tejun Heo
2011-05-23 15:51       ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-23 16:31         ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110519052903.GA2904@mtj.dyndns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@gmail.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®