Re: [PATCH v2] x86: UV uv_tlb.c cleanup

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

Ok, the whole file looks a lot better now. A few small details:

* Cliff Wickman <cpw@sgi.com> wrote:

> +	vp = kmalloc(nuvhubs * sizeof(struct uvhub_desc), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	uvhub_descs = (struct uvhub_desc *)vp;
> +	memset(uvhub_descs, 0, nuvhubs * sizeof(struct uvhub_desc));
> +	uvhub_mask = kzalloc((nuvhubs+7)/8, GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> +	if (get_cpu_topology(base_part_pnode, uvhub_descs, uvhub_mask)) {
> +		kfree(uvhub_descs);
> +		kfree(uvhub_mask);
> +		return 1;
> +	}
> +	if (summarize_uvhub_sockets(nuvhubs, uvhub_descs, uvhub_mask)) {
> +		kfree(uvhub_descs);
> +		kfree(uvhub_mask);
> +		return 1;
> +	}
> +
>  	kfree(uvhub_descs);
>  	kfree(uvhub_mask);
> +	init_per_cpu_tunables();
>  	return 0;

Look how the teardown of uvhub_descs and uvhub_mask is repeated 3 times (!).

What we do in the kernel instead are:

	if (func())
		goto fail;

	if (func2())
		goto fail;

	ret = 0;
out:
	kfree(ptr1);
	kfree(ptr2);

	return ret;

fail:
	ret = 1;
	goto out;
}

this makes it more obvious and more readable.

Thanks,

	Ingo