From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Vikram Narayanan <vikram186@gmail.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Documentation: update GregKH links
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 12:41:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110523194132.GA20700@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimtqCYveCewyKX_f4f544XQObCLXw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 01:03:43AM +0530, Vikram Narayanan wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:39 AM, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:01:25PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> From: Vikram Narayanan <vikram186@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> Fixed the broken links in the SubmittingPatches file.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Vikram Narayanan <vikram186@gmail.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
> >> ---
> >> ---
> >> Documentation/SubmittingPatches | 9 +++++----
> >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> --- linux-2.6.39-git6.orig/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
> >> +++ linux-2.6.39-git6/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
> >> @@ -714,10 +714,11 @@ Jeff Garzik, "Linux kernel patch submiss
> >> <http://linux.yyz.us/patch-format.html>
> >>
> >> Greg Kroah-Hartman, "How to piss off a kernel subsystem maintainer".
> >> - <http://www.kroah.com/log/2005/03/31/>
> >> - <http://www.kroah.com/log/2005/07/08/>
> >> - <http://www.kroah.com/log/2005/10/19/>
> >> - <http://www.kroah.com/log/2006/01/11/>
> >> + <http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/maintainer.html>
> >> + <http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/maintainer-02.html>
> >> + <http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/maintainer-03.html>
> >> + <http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/maintainer-04.html>
> >> + <http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/maintainer-05.html>
> >>
> >
> > I have no real objection to this, but the original links are not broken
> > at all, and still work just fine for me here, don't they for you as
> > well?
> At the time of submission of this patch, It didn't work for me. (It
> returned http://storm.he.net/cgi-bin/error404)
> That's why I searched for the updated links and sent a patch.
> But, It works fine now.
> Now, its your wish, whether or not to use this patch :)
Odd, anyway, your new links are a bit more descriptive, so again, no
objection from me.
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-23 19:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-23 18:55 [PATCH 1/5] Documentation: update dontdiff file Randy Dunlap
2011-05-23 18:57 ` [PATCH 2/5] Documentation: update epoll sysctl text Randy Dunlap
2011-05-23 18:58 ` [PATCH 3/5] Documentation: update LXR web link Randy Dunlap
2011-05-23 18:59 ` [PATCH 4/5] Documentation: fix vgaarbiter.txt typos etc Randy Dunlap
2011-05-23 19:01 ` [PATCH 5/5] Documentation: update GregKH links Randy Dunlap
2011-05-23 19:09 ` Greg KH
2011-05-23 19:33 ` Vikram Narayanan
2011-05-23 19:41 ` Greg KH [this message]
2011-05-23 20:00 Xose Vazquez Perez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110523194132.GA20700@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vikram186@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome