From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754245Ab1EYUHF (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 May 2011 16:07:05 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]:53891 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753219Ab1EYUHE (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 May 2011 16:07:04 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,268,1304319600"; d="scan'208";a="1680302" Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 13:06:06 -0700 From: Andi Kleen To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Andi Kleen , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v2 Message-ID: <20110525200606.GA23597@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: <1306351948-23382-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> <20110525195251.GA31268@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110525195251.GA31268@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > You ignored the majority of the review suggestions i gave you in the > previous thread, and you know that i won't apply your patches without > you addressing all feedback. Huh? I addressed all suggestions that I didn't explicitely reject (which were few) At least to my knowledge. If I missed something that I didn't reject please point it out. Thanks. -Andi