From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756245Ab1EZHui (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 May 2011 03:50:38 -0400 Received: from zone0.gcu-squad.org ([212.85.147.21]:14522 "EHLO services.gcu-squad.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755784Ab1EZHuh (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 May 2011 03:50:37 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 09:49:05 +0200 From: Jean Delvare To: "Yu, Fenghua" , Andi Kleen Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen , Jan Beulich Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] coretemp: Get microcode revision from cpu_data v2 Message-ID: <20110526094905.536ca3f1@endymion.delvare> In-Reply-To: <493994B35A117E4F832F97C4719C4C04011E2157D6@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <1306351948-23382-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> <1306351948-23382-3-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> <20110525225359.60d819d5@endymion.delvare> <493994B35A117E4F832F97C4719C4C04011E2157D6@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 25 May 2011 19:08:27 -0700, Yu, Fenghua wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jean Delvare [mailto:khali@linux-fr.org] > > Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 1:54 PM > > To: Andi Kleen > > Cc: x86@kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Andi Kleen; > > jbeulich@novell.com; Yu, Fenghua > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] coretemp: Get microcode revision from cpu_data > > v2 > > > > Hi Andi, > > > > On Wed, 25 May 2011 12:32:28 -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > From: Andi Kleen > > > > > > Now that the ucode revision is available in cpu_data remove > > > the existing code in coretemp.c to query it manually. Read the ucode > > > revision from cpu_data instead > > > > Where is this available? Not upstream yet, apparently. I get a build > > failure here. > > > > This is one of three patches. Cpu_data is defined in the first patch. You need to get the other two to test them. OK, thanks. This is (build-)tested now. Acked-by: Jean Delvare Andi, do you plan to merge this in 2.6.40 or later? -- Jean Delvare