From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jorge Eduardo Candelaria <jedu@slimlogic.co.uk>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>,
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@ti.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the voltage tree
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 12:58:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110527125830.447abb79.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201105271759.p4RHxa2X008919@hera.kernel.org>
On Fri, 27 May 2011 17:59:36 GMT Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/linus/c01e36dde4632e0a7474fddf0716f1e54f01f13e
> Commit: c01e36dde4632e0a7474fddf0716f1e54f01f13e
> Parent: 327e15af15248563c896c16adad6fc6e04bb5a4d
> Author: Jorge Eduardo Candelaria <jedu@slimlogic.co.uk>
> AuthorDate: Wed May 11 01:43:02 2011 -0500
> Committer: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
> CommitDate: Fri May 27 10:49:09 2011 +0100
>
> linux-next: build failure after merge of the voltage tree
>
> On May 10, 2011, at 9:27 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > Hi Jorge,
> >
> > On Tue, 10 May 2011 12:30:36 -0500 Jorge Eduardo Candelaria <jedu@slimlogic.co.uk> wrote:
> >>
> >> On May 10, 2011, at 3:38 AM, Liam Girdwood wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 12:44 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>>> Hi Liam,
> >>>>
> >>>> After merging the voltage tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> >>>> allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >>>>
> >>>> ERROR: "tps65910_gpio_init" [drivers/mfd/tps65910.ko] undefined!
> >>>> ERROR: "tps65910_irq_init" [drivers/mfd/tps65910.ko] undefined!
> >>>> ERROR: "irq_modify_status" [drivers/mfd/tps65910-irq.ko] undefined!
> >>>> ERROR: "irq_set_chip_and_handler_name" [drivers/mfd/tps65910-irq.ko] undefined!
> >>>> ERROR: "handle_edge_irq" [drivers/mfd/tps65910-irq.ko] undefined!
> >>>>
> >>>> I have used the voltage tree from next-20110509 for today.
> >>>
> >>> Jorge, could you send a fix for this today.
> >>
> >> The following patch should solve this:
> >>
> >> From: Jorge Eduardo Candelaria <jedu@slimlogic.co.uk>
> >> MFD: Fix TPS65910 build
> >>
> >> Support for tps65910 as a module is not available. The driver can
> >> only be compiled as built-in. OTOH, the regulator driver can still
> >> be built as module without breaking the compilation.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jorge Eduardo Candelaria <jedu@slimlogic.co.uk>
> >
> > Today (even with the above patch included) I got these errors from the
> > x86_64 allmodconfig build:
> >
> > tps65910.c:(.text+0xf4140): undefined reference to `i2c_master_send'
> > drivers/built-in.o: In function `tps65910_i2c_read':
> > tps65910.c:(.text+0xf41d2): undefined reference to `i2c_transfer'
> > drivers/built-in.o: In function `tps65910_i2c_init':
> > tps65910.c:(.init.text+0xcb83): undefined reference to `i2c_register_driver'
> > drivers/built-in.o: In function `tps65910_i2c_exit':
> > tps65910.c:(.exit.text+0x6e0): undefined reference to `i2c_del_driver'
> >
> > I have used the voltage tree from next-20110509 again today.
>
> Following patch should fix the dependency problems. Please review:
>
> From: Jorge Eduardo Candelaria <jedu@slimlogic.co.uk>
> [PATCH] MFD: TPS65910: Fix I2C dependency
>
> TPS65910 driver can only be compiled built-in, so the I2C driver
> should be as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jorge Eduardo Candelaria <jedu@slimlogic.co.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> index 05f882f..4990a49 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> @@ -721,7 +721,7 @@ config MFD_PM8XXX_IRQ
>
> config MFD_TPS65910
> bool "TPS65910 Power Management chip"
> - depends on I2C && GPIOLIB
> + depends on I2C=y && GPIOLIB
> select MFD_CORE
> help
> if you say yes here you get support for the TPS65910 series of
> --
Hi,
Current mainline build fails when GPIO is not enabled:
warning: (MFD_TPS65910) selects GPIO_TPS65910 which has unmet direct dependencies (GPIOLIB && MFD_TPS65910)
which causes:
In file included from drivers/gpio/tps65910-gpio.c:21:
include/linux/mfd/tps65910.h:774: error: field 'gpio' has incomplete type
drivers/gpio/tps65910-gpio.c: In function 'tps65910_gpio_get':
drivers/gpio/tps65910-gpio.c:25: warning: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of '__mptr'
drivers/gpio/tps65910-gpio.c:25: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
drivers/gpio/tps65910-gpio.c: In function 'tps65910_gpio_set':
drivers/gpio/tps65910-gpio.c:39: warning: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of '__mptr'
drivers/gpio/tps65910-gpio.c:39: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
drivers/gpio/tps65910-gpio.c: In function 'tps65910_gpio_output':
drivers/gpio/tps65910-gpio.c:52: warning: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of '__mptr'
drivers/gpio/tps65910-gpio.c:52: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
drivers/gpio/tps65910-gpio.c: In function 'tps65910_gpio_input':
drivers/gpio/tps65910-gpio.c:63: warning: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of '__mptr'
drivers/gpio/tps65910-gpio.c:63: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
drivers/gpio/tps65910-gpio.c: In function 'tps65910_gpio_init':
drivers/gpio/tps65910-gpio.c:96: error: implicit declaration of function 'gpiochip_add'
make[3]: *** [drivers/gpio/tps65910-gpio.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [drivers/gpio] Error 2
make[1]: *** [drivers] Error 2
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
next parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-27 19:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <201105271759.p4RHxa2X008919@hera.kernel.org>
2011-05-27 19:58 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2011-05-27 21:13 ` Liam Girdwood
2011-05-27 21:21 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-05-10 2:44 Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-10 8:38 ` Liam Girdwood
2011-05-10 17:30 ` Jorge Eduardo Candelaria
2011-05-10 19:57 ` Liam Girdwood
2011-05-11 2:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-11 6:43 ` Jorge Eduardo Candelaria
2011-05-11 13:29 ` Liam Girdwood
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-12-15 2:09 Stephen Rothwell
2010-12-15 9:04 ` Liam Girdwood
2010-12-15 14:03 ` Mark Brown
2010-12-14 4:49 Stephen Rothwell
2010-12-14 5:10 ` Yong Shen
2010-12-14 15:56 ` Liam Girdwood
2010-12-15 2:03 ` Yong Shen
2010-11-11 0:36 Stephen Rothwell
2010-11-11 11:46 ` Mark Brown
2010-11-11 12:09 ` Liam Girdwood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110527125830.447abb79.randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--to=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=jedu@slimlogic.co.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lrg@slimlogic.co.uk \
--cc=lrg@ti.com \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®