mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Turning off the incremental diff robot
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 13:10:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110530131052.8cc0c283.rdunlap@xenotime.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110530194500.GE10792@home.goodmis.org>

On Mon, 30 May 2011 15:45:00 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote:

> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 12:03:03PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > With the v3.0 name change I was looking over what might break, and I'm
> > seriously considering turning off the incremental diff robot on
> > kernel.org.  It's not clear to me that it is actually useful anymore,
> > with git and all.
> 
> What is the incremental diff robot?
> 
> Does it make the patches between 2.6.x to 2.6.x+1?
> 
> > 
> > Do anyone actually use these anymore?
> 
> If the above is the case, yes I do. And we need to update the ketchup
> script as well.


and scripts/patch-kernel needs to be fixed (or dropped).

It will use the incremental diffs, but I doubt that patch-kernel or the
incremental diffs model has many users (he said with no proof :).

They could go away IMO.  I only use git or -rc or daily tarballs.
The only time that I have used incremental diffs was for a poor man's
bisect, but git does it much better.

---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-30 20:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-30 19:03 H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-30 19:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-05-30 20:10   ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2011-05-30 20:49   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-31 12:38     ` Heiko Carstens
2011-05-31 12:49       ` Steven Rostedt
2011-06-01  6:22     ` Pavel Machek
2011-05-31 19:43 ` [kernel.org users] " Pavel Machek
2011-05-31 20:04   ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-05-31 20:13     ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-31 20:31       ` Pavel Machek
2011-05-31 19:52 ` Willy Tarreau
2011-05-31 20:13   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-01  8:43   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2011-06-01 15:46     ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-01 13:09 ` Jean Delvare
2011-06-01 13:34   ` Alexey Dobriyan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110530131052.8cc0c283.rdunlap@xenotime.net \
    --to=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®