From: Camille Moncelier <camille@moncelier.fr>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 3.0-rc1
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 15:38:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110530153826.456c63f8@rasalhague> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinE8eSSovGx6CPPkTeCpqv8AsS2nw@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, 29 May 2011 18:30:32 -0700
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> I decided to just bite the bullet, and call the next version 3.0. It
> will get released close enough to the 20-year mark, which is excuse
> enough for me, although honestly, the real reason is just that I can
> no longe rcomfortably count as high as 40.
So, this is a <odd>.x.y release right ? According to you the schedule
was:
> - 2.6.<odd>: still a stable kernel, but accept bigger changes leading
> up to it (timeframe: a month or two).
> - 2.<odd>.x: aim for big changes that may destabilize the kernel for
> several releases (timeframe: a year or two)
> - <odd>.x.x: Linus went crazy, broke absolutely _everything_, and
> rewrote the kernel to be a microkernel using a special
> message-passing version of Visual Basic. (timeframe: "we expect that
> he will be released from the mental institution in a decade or
> two").
Then the big question is where's that microkernel stuff you promised ?
Does the travel you are planning next week has anything to do with the
mental institution ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-30 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-30 1:30 Linus Torvalds
2011-05-30 1:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-30 2:29 ` Américo Wang
2011-05-30 6:38 ` Boaz Harrosh
2011-05-30 20:03 ` Mariusz Kozlowski
2011-05-30 22:48 ` david
2011-05-31 5:40 ` Mariusz Kozlowski
2011-05-31 7:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-05-30 1:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-30 15:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-05-30 2:04 ` Greg KH
2011-05-30 6:39 ` Tarkan Erimer
2011-05-30 9:46 ` Miles Bader
2011-05-30 10:09 ` Anca Emanuel
2011-05-30 10:37 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-30 12:03 ` Wanlong Gao
2011-05-30 12:05 ` Zhang, Shijie
2011-05-30 12:58 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-05-30 2:07 ` CaT
2011-05-30 6:01 ` Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
2011-05-30 6:43 ` [GIT PULL] small perf fix for v3.0-rc1 Ingo Molnar
2011-05-30 13:38 ` Camille Moncelier [this message]
2011-05-30 14:07 ` Linux 3.0-rc1 15Hz
2011-05-30 14:33 ` trapDoor
2011-05-30 20:33 ` Mustapha Rabiu
2011-05-30 20:50 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-05-31 5:59 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-05-31 10:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-05-31 6:01 ` Dave Airlie
2011-05-31 9:23 ` Willy Tarreau
2011-05-30 9:28 Sedat Dilek
2011-05-31 19:27 ` Sedat Dilek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110530153826.456c63f8@rasalhague \
--to=camille@moncelier.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®