From: Andreas Mohr <andi@lisas.de>
To: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>, Waldo Bastian <bastian@kde.org>,
Ryan Lortie <desrt@desrt.ca>,
Lennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Heads-up: Linux make menuconfig .config vs. XDG_CONFIG_HOME ~/.config/ clash - perhaps resolve it while 3.0 appears?
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 20:24:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110602182431.GA26282@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de> (raw)
Hello all,
I just discovered a Linux kernel make menuconfig .config file
accidentally situated in the home directory of a shell account
(simply scp:d over without much thought, thus directly ending up in main
user home on that machine, something which can happen quite easily
for a number of other reasons as well).
I then realized the potentially fatal ramifications of this.
XXXXXX:/tmp$ touch mytest
XXXXXX:/tmp$ mkdir mytest
mkdir: cannot create directory `mytest': File exists
XDG Base Directory Specification
http://standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/basedir-spec-latest.html
says:
"$XDG_CONFIG_HOME defines the base directory relative to which user
specific configuration files should be stored. If $XDG_CONFIG_HOME is
either not set or empty, a default equal to $HOME/.config should be
used."
And that mechanism is exactly what a ton of Linux userspace apps
(and hopefully many more in future) are already making use of
to store their configuration data in a manner
that's more friendly to user home directories.
It may thus be strongly advisable to rename the default name of the
make menuconfig kernel .config file (perhaps .config_lx / .config_linux ?)
to completely sidestep such a (mostly user-triggered)
problematic clash in future.
And (I cannot help but think of this) now that lx 3.0 is in -rc
this might still be an especially appropriate moment to do it ;)
(one would have to think of potential compatibility issues though)
Thanks for listening,
Andreas Mohr
next reply other threads:[~2011-06-02 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-02 18:24 Andreas Mohr [this message]
2011-06-03 8:25 ` Michal Marek
2011-06-03 13:17 ` Andreas Mohr
2011-06-03 14:38 ` Nick Bowler
2011-06-03 16:44 ` Arnaud Lacombe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110602182431.GA26282@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de \
--to=andi@lisas.de \
--cc=bastian@kde.org \
--cc=desrt@desrt.ca \
--cc=lennart@poettering.net \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®