From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752855Ab1FCR5Z (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jun 2011 13:57:25 -0400 Received: from mail-pw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:45459 "EHLO mail-pw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750969Ab1FCR5Y (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jun 2011 13:57:24 -0400 Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:57:23 -0600 From: Grant Likely To: Sascha Hauer Cc: Shawn Guo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, patches@linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Move Freescale MXS gpio driver into drivers/gpio Message-ID: <20110603175723.GE15616@ponder.secretlab.ca> References: <1306595374-25178-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <20110530064502.GC23771@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110530064502.GC23771@pengutronix.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 08:45:02AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > Grant, > > I suppose we should take this through the architecture tree. Can I have > your Ack for this? > Actually, as mentioned in my other email, I'd like to see this series respun with a separate patch for just moving the gpio driver (without breaking the build). Also, I've been thinking about how to merge these changes, and I'd rather take them through the gpio tree since there will be a lot of conflicts with the other gpio driver moves. It will be easier to resolve merge conflicts if I push it out to my tree and allow the subarch trees to merge in mine if necessary. g.