From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 idle: EXPORT_SYMBOL(default_idle, pm_idle) if CONFIG_APM_MODULE (only)
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 23:38:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110609233806.58361a92.rdunlap@xenotime.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1307677436.22348.589.camel@localhost>
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:43:56 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Commit 06ae40ce073daf233607a3c54a489f2c1e44683e ('x86 idle:
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(default_idle, pm_idle) only when APM demands it') made
> these exports dependent on CONFIG_APM_MODULE && CONFIG_APM_CPU_IDLE.
> However, the apm module always needs these symbols.
> CONFIG_APM_CPU_IDLE only controls whether it installs its CPU idle
> handler by default.
also fixed here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/6/8/170
but yes, someone please get it merged.
> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
> ---
> This fixes a regression in 3.0-rc1 and should be applied in this cycle.
>
> Ben.
>
> arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> index 2e4928d..e1ba8cb 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> @@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(boot_option_idle_override);
> * Powermanagement idle function, if any..
> */
> void (*pm_idle)(void);
> -#if defined(CONFIG_APM_MODULE) && defined(CONFIG_APM_CPU_IDLE)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_APM_MODULE
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(pm_idle);
> #endif
>
> @@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ void default_idle(void)
> cpu_relax();
> }
> }
> -#if defined(CONFIG_APM_MODULE) && defined(CONFIG_APM_CPU_IDLE)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_APM_MODULE
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(default_idle);
> #endif
>
> --
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-10 6:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-10 3:43 Ben Hutchings
2011-06-10 6:38 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110609233806.58361a92.rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--to=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®