From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755835Ab1F0Lto (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2011 07:49:44 -0400 Received: from zone0.gcu-squad.org ([212.85.147.21]:7043 "EHLO services.gcu-squad.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757199Ab1F0Lr1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2011 07:47:27 -0400 Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 13:47:05 +0200 From: Jean Delvare To: Suresh Siddha , Gary Hade , Ingo Molnar Cc: Thomas Gleixner , LKML Subject: Broke affinity for irq %i Message-ID: <20110627134705.1bd95126@endymion.delvare> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi all, Could someone familiar with function arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:fixup_irqs() please add log levels to messages "Broke affinity for irq %i\n" and "Cannot set affinity for irq %i\n"? As I put a few cores offline today because of high temperature (not sure if it really helps, but that's a different story) I got the following messages in my kernel log: Broke affinity for irq 72 Broke affinity for irq 71 Broke affinity for irq 75 Broke affinity for irq 74 Due to the lack of log level for these messages, I have no idea if there is something really wrong that I should report, or if this is a mere informational message, or even a debug message which shouldn't be printed at all by default. I would like this to be clarified. Thanks, -- Jean Delvare