mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	hch@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] kill tracehook_notify_death()
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:36:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110627143617.GC30101@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110627142136.GA5812@redhat.com>

Hello,

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 04:21:36PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Yes, but at the same time even __fatal_signal_pending() is too strong!
> What if the tracee exits on its own, and its sys_exit() races with
> exit_group() from another thread? In this case I think it should stop,
> but __fatal_signal_pending() is true.
>
> And worse. What if the tracee stops in PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT, and _then_
> another thread does sys_exit_group()? The tracee will be "killed".
> I do not think this is right. I think the "implicit" SIGKILL in this
> case should _not_ wake up the tracee. Only the real SIGKILL (or any
> fatal signal which mutates to SIGKILL). Otherwise we simply can't
> guarantee PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT works "reliably" in this case.

Indeed, for PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT to work properly, we would need to
discern between actual KILLs and the implicit ones.

> We have signal_group_exit()/SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT. I think we also need
> SIGNAL_THE_REAL_SIGKILL_WAS_SENT flag. Note also we have the similar
> problems with the coredump. SIGKILL should abort it. Also, we should
> define what TIF_SIGPENDIND and interruptible wait mean after exit_signals()
> and/or exit_notify(). Some drivers (tty? I do not remember) expect that
> the exiting task can do wait_event_interruptible() and react to ^C.

Eh... that sounds very shady.  Maybe we should try to remove that
weird requirement instead?

> > I don't have
> > any major problem with the original.  Please go ahead.
> 
> Thanks. Can I add your reviewed-by/acked-by ?

Sure, please feel free to add reviewed-by.  Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-27 14:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-17 14:50 [PATCHSET] ptrace: kill most tracehooks Tejun Heo
2011-06-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 1/7] ptrace: kill task_ptrace() Tejun Heo
2011-06-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 2/7] ptrace: introduce ptrace_event_enabled() and simplify ptrace_event() and tracehook_prepare_clone() Tejun Heo
2011-06-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 3/7] ptrace: move SIGTRAP on exec(2) logic to ptrace_event() Tejun Heo
2011-06-20 20:25   ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-21  7:21     ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-21 20:40       ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-23  8:58         ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 4/7] ptrace: kill trivial tracehooks Tejun Heo
2011-06-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 5/7] ptrace: kill clone/exec tracehooks Tejun Heo
2011-06-20 20:33   ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-21  7:24     ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 6/7] ptrace: kill detah tracehooks Tejun Heo
2011-06-20 19:39   ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-21 20:23     ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-23  9:24     ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-22 21:07   ` [PATCH 0/8] kill task_detached() (Was: ptrace: kill detah tracehooks) Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-22 21:08     ` [PATCH 1/8] make do_notify_parent() return bool Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-23  9:52       ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-22 21:08     ` [PATCH 2/8] kill tracehook_notify_death() Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-23 12:22       ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-23 13:21         ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-23 13:27           ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-23 13:28             ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-23 17:06               ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-25 14:15                 ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-26 20:51                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-27  8:24                     ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-27 14:21                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-27 14:36                         ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-06-22 21:08     ` [PATCH 3/8] __ptrace_detach: avoid task_detached(), check do_notify_parent() Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-23 13:25       ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-22 21:09     ` [PATCH 4/8] make do_notify_parent() __must_check, update the callers Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-23 13:38       ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-22 21:09     ` [PATCH 5/8] reparent_leader: check EXIT_DEAD instead of task_detached() Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-22 21:09     ` [PATCH 6/8] kill task_detached() Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-22 21:10     ` [PATCH 7/8] do not change dead_task->exit_signal Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-22 21:10     ` [PATCH 8/8] redefine thread_group_leader() as exit_signal >= 0 Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-23 13:56       ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 7/7] ptrace: s/tracehook_tracer_task()/ptrace_parent()/ Tejun Heo
2011-06-20 20:16   ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-21 11:44     ` John Johansen
2011-06-23  9:14     ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-20 11:16 ` [PATCHSET] ptrace: kill most tracehooks Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110627143617.GC30101@htj.dyndns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®