From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip, final] perf, x86: Add hw_watchdog_set_attr() in a sake of nmi-watchdog on P4
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 15:31:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110705133105.GB5843@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1309871841.3282.148.camel@twins>
* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> > So the question is, why does the NMI watchdog prevent 'perf top'
> > from working on a P4?
>
> because the NMI watchdog is a pinned event, you don't want to share
> the counter, that would be very bad, suppose you lock up when the
> NMI watchdog was scheduled out. Unreliably debug tools are worse
> than no tools.
Yeah, indeed that explains the symptom.
Firstly, we should fix/enhance perf top to print out an error message
in this case, not just hang there doing nothing.
Secondly, the proper solution would be to allow the multiplexing of
like-minded hw events. Here if we have two events:
- pinned NMI watchdog, set to a period of 2 billion cycles
- perf top with a default of 1 khz auto-freq cycles
We should first change the NMI watchdog to use auto-freq samples -
the hw_nmi_get_sample_period() looks unnecessary - if we set the NMI
watchdog to 1 Hz by default it should be more than enough.
Thus we'd have two events:
- pinned NMI watchdog, set to 1 Hz
- perf top, set to 1000 Hz
The 1000 Hz event could serve the 1 Hz event just fine.
Thirdly, even if we mucked the NMI event to be somewhat different
from the real cycles event (so the P4 PMU can co-schedule it with
perf top), the real solution there would *still* be to express this
as a variation of a cycles event: use the same trick to allow up to
two cycles events to be present in the PMU - but hide this from the
generic interfaces, just allow up to two cycles events to be
scheduled at once.
This will have the advantage of not only fixing the NMI watchdog, but
other users as well.
Now, if there's some real behavioral difference between the two
events (one is halted cycles the other is unhalted cycles), then i'd
suggest to use PERF_COUNT_HW_BUS_CYCLES in the NMI watchdog - that is
the generic 'constant frequency' cycles event.
So there's lots of options to fix/improve this more intelligently.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-05 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-05 10:03 Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-07-05 10:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-05 10:34 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-07-05 10:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-05 11:05 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-07-05 11:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-05 11:36 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-07-05 11:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-05 11:49 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-07-05 12:14 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-07-05 13:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-05 13:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-05 13:31 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-07-05 14:19 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-07-08 12:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-05 14:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-05 14:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-05 14:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-05 15:25 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-07-06 7:01 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-07-08 12:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-08 13:01 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-07-08 13:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-08 13:12 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-07-05 13:26 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-07-05 12:24 ` Don Zickus
2011-07-05 12:26 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-07-05 12:44 ` Don Zickus
2011-07-05 12:56 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110705133105.GB5843@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®