From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756065Ab1GFUFD (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2011 16:05:03 -0400 Received: from oproxy6-pub.bluehost.com ([67.222.54.6]:57643 "HELO oproxy6-pub.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1755800Ab1GFUFB (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2011 16:05:01 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=xenotime.net; h=Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:Organization:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Identified-User; b=Mh2UyrSsQQ9hQ/S8r2fN6ZPcO/kPp6BecPYBxv4isVcUojC21l4MWiK9Wnl9RdFQAilQseb1/2GVn9LKmRp3+d9kXU4nBlYH5+M03h61i1ghkC49ZfxMW1cBoY3JgI6Z; Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 13:04:58 -0700 From: Randy Dunlap To: Tobias Klauser Cc: Alexander Viro , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] VFS: Fixup kerneldoc for generic_permission() Message-Id: <20110706130458.a9d20575.rdunlap@xenotime.net> In-Reply-To: <20110706200221.GF8334@distanz.ch> References: <1309520691-17741-1-git-send-email-tklauser@distanz.ch> <20110706090014.d46bbbe3.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <20110706200221.GF8334@distanz.ch> Organization: YPO4 X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.7.1 (GTK+ 2.16.6; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {1807:box742.bluehost.com:xenotime:xenotime.net} {sentby:smtp auth 50.53.38.135 authed with rdunlap@xenotime.net} Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 22:02:21 +0200 Tobias Klauser wrote: > On 2011-07-06 at 18:00:14 +0200, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 13:44:51 +0200 Tobias Klauser wrote: > > > > > The flags parameter went away in > > > 5c90c1601f00154f8695951469f25f33579272ed > > > > What git tree is that commit ID in? > > I made the patch against linux-next as of 1 July. The commit comes from > Al Viro's vfs-2.6 tree I guess. > > > This patch applies to linux-next, right? > > Yup, it should. Sorry, I should have mentioned that in the subject. > -- Thanks. Hopefully Al will merge it. If he misses it, please resend it and I can merge it. --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***