From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756474Ab1GFVLm (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2011 17:11:42 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:33708 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756362Ab1GFVLl (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2011 17:11:41 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 v1] PM / Domains: Generic PM domains improvements Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 23:12:49 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/3.0.0-rc5+; KDE/4.6.0; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Linux PM mailing list , LKML , Kevin Hilman , Alan Stern , MyungJoo Ham , Chanwoo Choi , Paul Walmsley , Magnus Damm References: <201107062248.35586.rjw@sisk.pl> <20110706210856.GA1215@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20110706210856.GA1215@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201107062312.49584.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, July 06, 2011, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 10:48:35PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Hi, > > > > For the last few days I've been working on modifications of the generic > > PM domains code allowing .start_device()/.stop_device() and drivers' > > .runtime_suspend()/.runtime_resume() callbacks to execute things like > > pm_runtime_resume() for other devices in the same PM domain safely > > without deadlocking (the original motivation was a console driver on > > shmobile that pm_runtime_get_*()/pm_runtime_put_*() are called for from > > the other devices' .runtime_suspend()/.runtime_resume() callbacks). > > > > I think I solved that problem, but in the process I found a few places > > where fixes and/on improvements were necessary. The patches in this > > series address those issues. They are on top of the branch at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/suspend-2.6.git pm-domains > > > > Patches [1-2/5] are regarded as 3.1 material, the others not necessarily, > > but I'd like to push them for 3.1 too if there are no complaints. > > No complaints from me, looks nice. Thanks! Rafael