mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@gmail.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>,
	Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>, Hu Tao <hutao@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/17] CFS Bandwidth Control v7.1
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 13:23:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110707112302.GB8227@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110707053036.173186930@google.com>


* Paul Turner <pjt@google.com> wrote:

> The summary results (from Hu Tao's most recent run) are:
>                                             cycles                   instructions            branches
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> base                                        7,526,317,497           8,666,579,347            1,771,078,445
> +patch, cgroup not enabled                  7,610,354,447 (1.12%)   8,569,448,982 (-1.12%)   1,751,675,193 (-0.11%)
> +patch, 10000000000/1000(quota/period)      7,856,873,327 (4.39%)   8,822,227,540 (1.80%)    1,801,766,182 (1.73%)
> +patch, 10000000000/10000(quota/period)     7,797,711,600 (3.61%)   8,754,747,746 (1.02%)    1,788,316,969 (0.97%)
> +patch, 10000000000/100000(quota/period)    7,777,784,384 (3.34%)   8,744,979,688 (0.90%)    1,786,319,566 (0.86%)
> +patch, 10000000000/1000000(quota/period)   7,802,382,802 (3.67%)   8,755,638,235 (1.03%)    1,788,601,070 (0.99%)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Well, the most recent run Hu Tao sent (with lockdep disabled) are 
different:

 table 2. shows the differences between patch and no-patch. quota is set
          to a large value to avoid processes being throttled.

        quota/period          cycles                   instructions             branches
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
base                          1,146,384,132           1,151,216,688            212,431,532
patch   cgroup disabled       1,163,717,547 (1.51%)   1,165,238,015 ( 1.22%)   215,092,327 ( 1.25%)
patch   10000000000/1000      1,244,889,136 (8.59%)   1,299,128,502 (12.85%)   243,162,542 (14.47%)
patch   10000000000/10000     1,253,305,706 (9.33%)   1,299,167,897 (12.85%)   243,175,027 (14.47%)
patch   10000000000/100000    1,252,374,134 (9.25%)   1,299,314,357 (12.86%)   243,203,923 (14.49%)
patch   10000000000/1000000   1,254,165,824 (9.40%)   1,299,751,347 (12.90%)   243,288,600 (14.53%)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The +1.5% increase in vanilla kernel context switching performance is 
unfortunate - where does that overhead come from?

The +9% increase in cgroups context-switching overhead looks rather 
brutal.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-07-07 11:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-07  5:30 Paul Turner
2011-07-07  5:30 ` [patch 01/17] sched: (fixlet) dont update shares twice on on_rq parent Paul Turner
2011-07-21 18:28   ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Don't " tip-bot for Paul Turner
2011-07-07  5:30 ` [patch 02/17] sched: hierarchical task accounting for SCHED_OTHER Paul Turner
2011-07-07  5:30 ` [patch 03/17] sched: introduce primitives to account for CFS bandwidth tracking Paul Turner
2011-07-07 13:48   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-07 21:30     ` Paul Turner
2011-07-07  5:30 ` [patch 04/17] sched: validate CFS quota hierarchies Paul Turner
2011-07-07  5:30 ` [patch 05/17] sched: accumulate per-cfs_rq cpu usage and charge against bandwidth Paul Turner
2011-07-07  5:30 ` [patch 06/17] sched: add a timer to handle CFS bandwidth refresh Paul Turner
2011-07-07  5:30 ` [patch 07/17] sched: expire invalid runtime Paul Turner
2011-07-07  5:30 ` [patch 08/17] sched: add support for throttling group entities Paul Turner
2011-07-07  5:30 ` [patch 09/17] sched: add support for unthrottling " Paul Turner
2011-07-07  5:30 ` [patch 10/17] sched: allow for positional tg_tree walks Paul Turner
2011-07-07  5:30 ` [patch 11/17] sched: prevent interactions with throttled entities Paul Turner
2011-07-07  5:30 ` [patch 12/17] sched: prevent buddy " Paul Turner
2011-07-07  5:30 ` [patch 13/17] sched: migrate throttled tasks on HOTPLUG Paul Turner
2011-07-07  5:30 ` [patch 14/17] sched: throttle entities exceeding their allowed bandwidth Paul Turner
2011-07-07  5:30 ` [patch 15/17] sched: add exports tracking cfs bandwidth control statistics Paul Turner
2011-07-07  5:30 ` [patch 16/17] sched: return unused runtime on group dequeue Paul Turner
2011-07-07  5:30 ` [patch 17/17] sched: add documentation for bandwidth control Paul Turner
2011-07-07 11:13 ` [patch 00/17] CFS Bandwidth Control v7.1 Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-11  1:22   ` Hu Tao
2011-07-07 11:23 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-07-07 11:28   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-07 14:38   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-07 14:51     ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-07 14:54       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-07 14:56         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-07 16:23           ` Jason Baron
2011-07-07 17:20             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-07 18:15               ` Jason Baron
2011-07-07 20:36                 ` jump_label defaults (was Re: [patch 00/17] CFS Bandwidth Control v7.1) Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-08  9:20                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-08 15:47                     ` Jason Baron
2011-07-07 16:52     ` [patch 00/17] CFS Bandwidth Control v7.1 Andi Kleen
2011-07-07 17:08       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-07 17:59     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-07 19:36       ` Jason Baron
2011-07-08  7:45       ` Paul Turner
2011-07-08  7:39     ` Paul Turner
2011-07-08 10:32       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-09  7:34         ` Paul Turner
2011-07-10 18:12           ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-07 14:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-08  7:35   ` Paul Turner
2011-07-11  1:22 ` Hu Tao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110707112302.GB8227@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dhaval.giani@gmail.com \
    --cc=hutao@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=xemul@openvz.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®