From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753977Ab1GHP5z (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jul 2011 11:57:55 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:47446 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750844Ab1GHP5x (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jul 2011 11:57:53 -0400 Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 17:57:52 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: LKML Subject: Re: [Cleanup PATCH] rcu: Do not use rcu_read_lock_held when calling rcu_dereference_check Message-ID: <20110708155752.GE12834@tiehlicka.suse.cz> References: <20110708135739.GB12834@tiehlicka.suse.cz> <20110708154829.GS6014@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110708154829.GS6014@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri 08-07-11 08:48:29, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 03:57:39PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > I guess that this falls down to your area because the code, even though > > it touches multiple areas, is RCU specific. Let me know if I should > > break it into smaller pieces or that I should push it through other > > trees. > > > > git grep -n -A3 "\ > variants to be "affected". > > Hello, Michal, > > Good catch, thank you!!! > > Could you please break this up by maintainer? OK, will do. > > I have already queued your changes to Documentation/RCU/lockdep.txt with > your Signed-off-by (probably for 3.1), so please don't worry about those. OK -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs SUSE LINUX s.r.o. Lihovarska 1060/12 190 00 Praha 9 Czech Republic