From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756142Ab1GJMeF (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jul 2011 08:34:05 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:42923 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755930Ab1GJMeC (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jul 2011 08:34:02 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Pekka Enberg Subject: Re: [Bug #38132] [Warning] 2.6.39.x latencytop Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 14:35:11 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/3.0.0-rc6+; KDE/4.6.0; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Maciej Rutecki , Florian Mickler , Andrew Watts , Steven Rostedt , Ingo Molnar , Frederic Weisbecker References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201107101435.12161.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday, July 10, 2011, Pekka Enberg wrote: > On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.38 and 2.6.39. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.38 and 2.6.39. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38132 > > Subject : [Warning] 2.6.39.x latencytop > > Submitter : Andrew Watts > > Date : 2011-06-14 17:07 (27 days old) > > Message-ID : <80098.5633.qm@web111013.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130807128506490&w=2 > > This is a WARN_ON added in commit 6752ab4a ("tracing: Deprecate > tracing_enabled for tracing_on") that lets the user know about > deprecated ABI. It's somewhat unfortunate that there's no mention in > the changelog if everyone agreed on the deprecation or not... > > That said, assuming the deprecation is OK (hi Steven, Frederic, Ingo!) > I think this issue can be closed. OK Rafael