From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752462Ab1GKJbm (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jul 2011 05:31:42 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:41379 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750891Ab1GKJbl (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jul 2011 05:31:41 -0400 Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:31:24 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Mark Brown Cc: Jeremy Kerr , Grant Likely , patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] clk: Initial feedback for off-SoC slow bus clocks Message-ID: <20110711093124.GA3239@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20110711025344.GA27497@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110711025344.GA27497@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:53:44AM +0900, Mark Brown wrote: > The biggest issue I ran into was that as the clocks are all registered > by name with the API if you've got two instances of the same off-SoC > device in the system you'll not be able to disambiguate between the > clocks it provides. Sigh. That sounds like yet more trash. Obviously whoever thought up that doesn't actually understand clks.